Laserfiche WebLink
fy oT <br /> �� �' <br /> B GHIO N <br /> th,,city that writs For you <br /> Memo <br /> Date: August 10, 2012 <br /> To: Planning Commission <br /> From: Janice Gundlach, City PlannerJb <br /> Subject: Follow-Up Report on Bell Pole Nonconforming Use <br /> Permit <br /> The Commission may recall, in October of 2011 Bell Pole obtained Site Plan and <br /> Nonconforming Use Permit approval to build a second story office addition at <br /> their property located at 778 1st ST NW. The company constructed the building <br /> over the spring and summer and the project is now complete. At the time of <br /> approval of the building addition, condition #4 of Resolution 11-100 stated the <br /> following: <br /> "The applicant studies the use of dust curbing chemicals deeper within the <br /> storage yard to mitigate dust during the summer months and study <br /> mitigation methods to curb the off-gassing effect poles stored within the <br /> yard are having on overall odors and report back to Community <br /> Development staff by January 31, 2012 and to the Planning Commission <br /> at their regular meeting in February 2012. Examples of off-gassing <br /> mitigation methods may include covering the poles and/or reducing the <br /> overall stock of poles on site." <br /> The purpose of this memo is to provide the Planning Commission with an update <br /> on the company's progress in addressing issues mentioned above. <br /> The City has had a long history of zoning and regulatory discussions with Bell <br /> Pole over the years. Because the company has been in New Brighton since the <br /> early 1920's, it pre-dates much of City's municipal and zoning codes. That does <br /> not mean it is free to do whatever it wants, rather the company has some <br /> inherent rights that allow it to operate differently from other industrial businesses. <br /> Perhaps the most well-known issue concerns odor and to a lesser extent dust. <br /> To be more direct, the company has the right to produce a certain amount of <br /> odor, some of which leaves the property. This has been a difficult issue to <br /> regulate and the parties have taken a cooperative approach to reduce odors to <br /> the greatest extent possible. <br /> In 2007, the City entered into a Memorandum of Understanding concerning <br /> odors. At the time, a significant amount of research was done and improvements <br /> were made by Bell Pole to eliminate detectable odors leaving the stack of their <br /> treatment facility. A key point is that Bell Pole asserted it had grandfather rights <br />