My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015.02.24 Work Session Minutes
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
MInutes 2015
>
2015.02.24 Work Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2015 7:05:55 AM
Creation date
3/27/2015 7:05:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Jacobsen requested the Council now discuss roosters and the appropriate size of chicken coops. He was <br />in fa vor of not allowing roo sters in the City. <br />Councilmember Burg and Councilmember Bauman agreed. <br />Councilmember Strub did not believe there were enough compl aints to limit roosters in the City. <br />Councilmember Burg was in fa vor of limiting the number of chickens/fowls to eight to ten as this closely <br />reflected the number of chickens New Brighton residents already have. <br />Mayor Jacobsen suggested that lot size also be consi dered when setting a fo wl limit. Gundlach reviewed the <br />average lot size fo r homes in New Brighton. <br />Councilmember Bauman discussed the research she has conducted regarding chickens and coops. She <br />reviewed some of the infonnation she gathered from her research, along with the diseases these animals can <br />carry . She questioned how the City would address the disposal of chicken carcasses if a bird were to die. She <br />di scussed the diseases chicken carried and noted their eggs were more likely to have salmonella. It was her <br />opinion that chickens did not belong in the suburb s or the City of New Brighton. <br />Councilmember Strub asked if the code required a yard to be fen ced. Code Enforcement Officer Hatch <br />explained that the task fo rce was recommending that chickens be restrained or have a place to run, but was not <br />requiring a yard to be fen ced. <br />Mayor Jacobsen recommended the code include language that would require chickens to be restrained. <br />Councilmember Burg questioned if two neighbors could share a chicken coop. Code Enforcement Officer <br />Hatch beli eved that this would be allowed unless a complaint was brought to the City. Gundlach commented <br />that coops would have setback requirements. <br />Mayor Jacobsen discussed the requirements he has on a piece of fann land that he owns in Otter Tail Co unty. <br />He stated he had more requirements on that land than he does on his New Brighton property with regard to <br />chickens. He was in fa vor of allowing ei ght chickens on a New Brighton lot. <br />Councilmember Burg suggested the number of chickens be based on the size of a homeowner's property. She <br />was in fa vor of allowing up to 24 chickens fo r residents with two-acre parcel s. <br />Counci lmember Bauman did not support this recommendation. <br />Mayor Jacobsen believed it would be important fo r residents to gain the appro val of their neighbors prior to <br />having chickens. <br />Councilmember Strub questioned if any cities required notification of neighbors. Code Enforcement Officer <br />Hatch explained that the City of Minneapolis required 90% of neighbors within 100 fe et to support the request. <br />He noted the task fo rce discussed this matter but did not make this a recommendation due to the fa ct neighbors <br />could move away as time goes by. <br />I Councilmember Bauman did not want to see New Brighton become the chicken capital of the Twin Cities. <br />J She believed this matter needed further considerati on. She understood homeowners had property rights, but <br />she also did not want to hurt residents' property values by having chicken coops everywhere.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.