My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015.04.21 PC Minutes
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
2015
>
2015.04.21 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2015 1:04:28 PM
Creation date
5/26/2015 1:02:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner McPherson questioned if the applicant has discussed with staff how often rail cars would be <br />located within their 1,000 foot siding. Planning Director Gundlach deferred this question to the applicant. She <br />believed that this information was uncertain at this time. <br />Commissioner Deick inquired if the applicant were to build an enclosed structure if staff would support the new <br />building. Planning Director Gundlach provided an overview of the discussions staff has had with the applicant <br />regarding changing the principle use on the Belair expansion site to warehouse. She indicated the applicant was <br />not interested in pursuing this option. <br />Commissioner Deick asked how salt would be transferred from the rail cars to the storage shed. Mike <br />Murlowski, Murlowski Properties, explained that the drop bottom rail cars would be brought into the siding and <br />the salt would be dropped onto a conveyor, which would be conveyed to the storage shed. He commented that <br />the salt would then be stacked and stored, then loaded onto dump trucks for resale. <br />Commissioner Deick questioned how the applicant would address ground contamination. Mr. Murlowski <br />reported that the proposed transfer method would ensure that no contamination would occur. In addition, the <br />salt would be stored in an enclosed building with a hard surface to ensure there was no leaching. <br />Commissioner McPherson inquired how many truck loads would be taken out of the site each day for salt sales. <br />Mr. Murlowski proposed to do 13,500 tons in salt sales annually. He reported that this was not a new use to <br />him but rather an expansion of a current use. He anticipated that this would equate to 50 extra truck loads per <br />month. He explained that road salt was an important part of his winter business. He believed that the proposed <br />expansion to his business was a reasonable ask. <br />Commissioner Danger questioned how many tons a typical dump truck carried. Mr. Murlowski stated a dump <br />truck could hold 22 tons. <br />Commissioner Nichols - Matkaiti inquired how salt was currently being brought to the salt. Mr. Murlowski <br />commented the salt was brought in by truck. He stated it would be in his best interest to use rail cars, unload <br />them and have them move on quickly from his site or he would be charged storage fees. <br />Commissioner Danger asked when the salt sales would occur. Mr. Murlowski reported the sales would take <br />place November through March. <br />Commissioner Danger reviewed the amount of sales Mr. Murlowski had projected and explained it would be <br />closer to an addition 100 trucks per month based on his projected sales. Mr. Murlowski did not believe that the <br />extra truck traffic would impact the City. <br />Commissioner Danger questioned how high the 100 x 100 foot building would be. Mr. Murlowski indicated the <br />building would be 16 feet in height. He stated that this sized building would allow for fewer deliveries. <br />Commissioner Deick inquired if the applicant was averse to enclosing the building on all four sides. Mr. <br />Murlowski believed this was necessary and noted the building would be open on the east side for transfer <br />purposes. <br />Commissioner Danger feared how the City would be impacted by salt fragments that could escape the semi - <br />truck trailers while being brought in or out of the City. Mr. Murlowski explained the trailers would be sealed <br />and did not believe this would be an issue. He reported this was an expensive commodity and vendors would <br />not want to lose product in transit. <br />Commissioner Danger inquired how the City would monitor the 110 day rail car requirement. Planning <br />Director Gundlach reported the applicant would be responsible for keeping a rail car log, which would be <br />inspected by the City on an annual basis. Revocation of a special use permit could be considered by the City if <br />all conditions were not being followed by the applicant. <br />Commissioner Deick believed that the rail cars would not be noticeable from surrounding properties. Planning <br />Director Gundlach commented that residents would be able to see into the Belair property from the Long Lake <br />Park picnic structure. She discussed the proposed trail expansion that would be completed along the creek by <br />Ramsey County. Mr. Murlowski did not believe that pedestrians walking on the adjacent trail would be able to <br />see into his property given the 50 foot change in elevation between the trail and his property. He discussed the <br />additional screening he would be providing on his property to screen Old Highway 8. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.