Laserfiche WebLink
May 12, 2015 <br />9. Consideration of Application for a Solicitor License for Platinum Marketing, representing <br />Honest 1 Auto Repair. <br />Motion by Councilmember Jacobsen, seconded by Councilmember Burg to approve the Consent <br />Agenda as presented. <br />5 Ayes, 0 Nays - Motion Carried <br />Public Hearing <br />Consideration of Ordinance 834, amending Article 1 of Chapter 6 of the City Code <br />concerning the keeping of fowl and bees. <br />City Manager Lotter indicated Assistant Director of Community Assets & Development/Planning Director <br />Gundlach and Code Enforcement Officer Hatch would be presenting this item to the Council. <br />Assistant Director of Community Assets & Development/Planning Director Gundlach reviewed the <br />legislative history of this matter noting the Council appoi nted a task force to begin discussing urban fanning in <br />New Brighton. She indicated the topic of urban farming has garnered a lot of attention locally <br />since the summer of 2013. <br />Code Enforcement Officer Hatch provided further comment on the reason for attention to <br />urban farming has been complaints that cannot be resolved because the City's regulations are <br />silent on the keeping of chickens and other fowl. The common themes that have emerged, <br />whether a proponent or opponent of urban farming, have been the keeping of chickens and <br />their associated coops. In an effort to better understand the issues, the Council created and <br />appointed a nine - member task force on September 10, 2013. That task force held seven <br />meetings over a period of eight months and forwarded a recommendation to Council on where <br />regulation should be focused, and loosely what that regulation might look like. Since then, and <br />over the past eight months, Council has been discussing the recommendation of the UFTF in <br />an effort to establish what regulations need to be enacted to preserve the quality of life in New <br />Brighton. <br />Assistant Director of Community Assets & Development/Planning Director Gundlach explained that these <br />regulations have been drafted into ordinance form and been discussed in multiple work <br />sessions. Staff has incorporated the Council directives from those work session discussions <br />into proposed Ordinance 834. The regulations codified in this ordinance include: <br />• Establishment of a maximum number of fowl allowed per lot based on lot area. The <br />range is from 6 fowl on lots of 20,000 SF or less, up to 18 fowl on lots greater than an <br />acre in area. <br />• A minimum coop size of three (3) SF per fowl kept. <br />• Coop setback standards <br />• General coop maintenance and sanitary standards <br />• A provision that requires residents to keep their fowl on their own property <br />• A prohibition on roosters <br />• For bee owners, a hive notification and water source requirement <br />Assistant Director of Community Assets & Development/Planning Director Gundlach reported as currently <br />drafted, proposed Ordinance 834 would not officially go into effect until six months from the <br />date of its publication in the official City newspaper. This allows residents time to come into <br />compliance with the new provisions. Lastly, the topic of urban farming was very broad and <br />there were a number of other relevant issues discussed by Council and the UFTF, but are not <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />9. Solicitor Lic. for <br />Platinum Marketing <br />representing Honest 1 Auto <br />Repair. <br />Public Hearing <br />1. Consideration of <br />Ordinance 834, <br />amending Article 1 of <br />Chapter 6 of the City <br />Code concerning the <br />keeping of fowl and <br />bees. <br />