Laserfiche WebLink
May 12, 2015 Page 4 of 13 <br />reflected in the proposed ordinance. This is because the regulations that would be enacted by <br />the proposed ordinance aim to address the main areas of concern and /or complaint and that <br />directly impact the everyday quality of life for New Brighton residents. Staff maintains these <br />regulations, and other similar regulations, may be revisited if and when other issues emerge. <br />She recommended the Council hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance 834 amending <br />Article 1 of Chapter 6 of the City Code concerning fowl and bees. <br />Mayor Jacobsen asked what the lot size had to be in order to allow for 24 chickens. Assistant <br />Director of Community Assets & Development/Planning Director Gundlach reported that after much <br />discussion by the Council, 24 chickens would not be allowed on any lot in New Brighton. The maximum <br />number of chickens allowed would be 18 and only on lots larger than one acre. <br />Councilmember Burg questioned if the City restricted chickens under its current code. Assistant <br />Director of Community Assets & Devetopment/Planning Director Gundlach explained that the City had <br />Ordinance in place to regulate chickens at this time. <br />Councilmember Burg inquired how many lots in New Brighton were larger than one acre. Assistant Director <br />of Community Assets & Develop im it/Planning Director Gundlach commented the City had 94 lots that <br />were larger than one acre. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen asked if there were currently chickens in residential neighborhoods. Assistant <br />Director of Community Assets & Development/Planning Director Gundlach was aware of at least 30 <br />properties in New Brighton that had chickens. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen questioned how many calls for service or complaints the properties with chickens <br />generated on a yearly basis. Code Enforcement Officer Hatch recalled that five complaints were received last <br />summer. He believed that each of the disputes were able to be resolved with the nei ghbols. <br />Motion by Councilmember Bauman, seconded by Councilmember Burg to open the <br />Public Hearing. <br />5 Ayes, 0 Nays - Motion Carried <br />The Public Hearing was opened at 7:00 p.m. <br />Mayor Jacobsen asked for additional comments. <br />Julia Stephens, 720 Forest Dale Road, understood the Council has been discussing this topic <br />for several years. She thanked the Council for listening to both sides of this issue in order to <br />reach a balanced solution. She requested that the City reconsider how it has allotted chickens <br />per lot size. She suggested that one chicken be allowed per 2,000 square feet for lots over <br />10,000 square feet. She felt this was a more fair option for homeowners with larger lots. She <br />encouraged New Brighton to be forward thinking. <br />Bruce Knight, 50 32"d Avenue NW, stated he was against having chickens in the City of New <br />Brighton. He opposed this for the following reasons: aesthetics, health and safety, property <br />values, tax revenue and expenses, and lastly, common sense. It was his opinion that chicken <br />coops were unsightly and numerous coops around the City would bring down property values. <br />He believed that the risk for disease and predatory animals coming into the community would <br />increase if chickens were allowed. He commented that the City would not be making any <br />additional revenue by allowing chickens, but may have increased expenses due to the staff it <br />would take to enforce the Ordinance. Mr. Knight recommended that the Council hear the voice <br />of the residents not in favor of chickens. <br />Rick Moses, 2049 29th Avenue NW, preferred that the City of New Brighton not allow <br />chickens. He was concerned about property values and how those would be impacted if his <br />neighbors were to have chickens. He suggested that if chickens were allowed, that the City <br />license, regulate and enforce City Code requirements. He believed that the task force did not <br />fully address odor and noise concerns. He commented that if odors occur, the homeowners <br />