Laserfiche WebLink
May 26, 2015 Page 6 of 11 <br />new information received, the special use conditions for the salt storage and transfer use within the ECOA <br />ordinance have been expanded. The additional conditions are drafted into proposed Ordinance 832, Section <br />6- 800(4), and include: <br />• Salt shed square footage not to exceed 10,000 SF, be a four -sided shed and include a roof and <br />inm})elmeable floor. The shed must also be `seasonably" screened from adjacent and nearby residential <br />uses. The applicant's revised grading plan depicts a salt shed location more southwesterly than the <br />location depicted on the original Site Plan. <br />• The rail delivery methods represented by the applicant have been made a condition of approval. This <br />includes bottom -drop rail cars and unloading into a concrete containment pit Addition-,lly, the loader <br />used to move the salt to the shed must be equipped with an OSHA approved "shoosh" back up beeper <br />(a quieter alternative). <br />• The number of deliveries is restricted by season and month. <br />• Truck trips are limited to 615 between October and March, with average daily trips not to exceed 6.5 <br />within this same time period. <br />• Per delivery and maximum monthly salt delivery tonnages are included, ensuring the total 13,500 tons <br />is not exceeded. <br />• Delivery hours of operation are included and weekend and holiday deliveries are prohibited. <br />• An Environmental Storm Water Sampling Program is required in an effort to address environmental <br />concerns with salt loading of adjacent and nearby water bodies. The conditions of approval <br />recommended by staff include continued responsibility to ensure down gradient storm water receptors <br />are not negatively impacted by the applicant's salt use, even if the original program has ceased. <br />Assistant Director of Community Assets and DevelopinentlPlanlvng Director Gundlach reported that staff <br />reached out to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Rice Creek Watershed District staff to comment on <br />the applicant's proposed Environmental Storm Water Sampling Program. As of the date of this memo, no <br />comments were received. Both authorities have previously indicated they have no permitting requirements <br />for the proposed salt use. Staff will forward any comments to Council at the meeting. <br />Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development/Planning Director Gundlach explained that the <br />proposed Ordinance, Resolution, and Land Use Agreement continue to limit pile storage based on the staff <br />recommended 8 acres rather than the applicant's proposed 11 acres as this was the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation and seemed agreeable to the Council at the April 28th meeting. Also included are the <br />Planning Commission's recommendations the salt shed be four -sided and rail cars cannot be stored on the <br />applicant's siding by a third party for compensation. The applicant's updated narrative requests the fourth side <br />to the shed be eliminated as well as the 3rd party rail storage compensation condition. Should the Council <br />wish to eliminate these conditions, they should be removed from the approval Resolution during the motion. <br />Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development/Planning Director Gundlach commented that <br />based on Council direction from the April 28, 2015 meeting, staff finds the actionable documents attached <br />encompass as many conditions as possible to mitigate any negative impacts that may result from the salt <br />storage and transfer facility use. Should the Council wish to reconsider approval of the salt use, the actionable <br />documents from the original staff recommendation denying the salt use are included in the April 28, 2015 <br />Council packet and are an option for adoption. <br />Mayor Jacobsen asked how much additional run off from the salt storage would end up in the City's storm <br />sewer system. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development/Planning Director Gundlach did <br />not have an understanding of how much salt would runoff into the City's storm sewer system. She <br />anticipated that the salt being purchased from Bel Air was being used on roadways, but did not know if this <br />was exclusive to New Brighton streets. She commented that the MPCA was monitoring water bodies that <br />have chloride impairments. <br />Mayor Jacobsen expressed fiustiation that the City would allow additional salt storage and usage within the <br />