Laserfiche WebLink
July 26, 2016 Page 4 of 7 <br />Councilmember Bauman feared how the loss of access at County Road I would impact New Brighton <br />residents. She stated she was not a fan of MnPASS lanes and suggested MnDOT open the new lanes to all <br />traffic. <br />Councilmember Strub shared his thoughts on the project. He respected Councilmember <br />Bauman’s thoughts, but he believed MnPASS lanes were effective. He welcomed the <br />MnPASS lane and looked forward to it being connected from Forest Lake to Burnsville. He <br />understood that without the MnPASS lane, the project would not move forward. Community <br />Assets and Development Director Schlichting understood that MnPASS was the best option for moving the <br />highest volume of traffic through the corridor. He provided further comment on how freeway sections were <br />selected for noise walls along with the voting process that would be used for the noise walls. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen thanked staff for the thorough presentation. He appreciated the proposed <br />improvements and believed the new sound walls would benefit the community. <br />Mayor Johnson saw the MnPASS lane as an enhancement to the community as it would assist <br />in moving traffic to and from New Brighton in a more efficient manner. <br /> <br />5 Ayes, 0 Nays-Motion Carried <br /> <br />Council Business <br />1. Consideration of Acceptance of Interim Financial Statements for the Second <br />Quarter of 2016. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Jacobsen, seconded by Councilmember Bauman to accept the Second <br />Quarter 2016 Interim Financial Statements. <br /> <br />City Manager Lotter indicated Finance Director Davitt would be presenting this item to the Council. <br />Finance Director Davitt explained in an effort to keep the Council informed on the City’s fiscal <br />condition, a comparison of the 2016 revenues and expenditures for the period ending June 30th, 2016 <br />(unaudited) was reviewed with the Council. The comparison shown includes those programs and <br />services that constitute the City’s core functions for which changes in financial trends can have a near- <br />term impact on the ability to maintain current service levels. Programs such as debt service and tax <br />increment financing which are governed by pre-existing obligations and restricted revenues are not <br />shown. In addition, expenditures in the City’s Fleet and Non-Fleet programs are not shown as these <br />expenditures are specifically tied to pre-funded asset replacement funds. These replacement funds are <br />not susceptible to year-to-year fluctuations and therefore annual reviews are considered sufficient. <br />The information is presented strictly on a cash basis which measures only the actual revenues that have <br />been deposited and the actual expenditures that have been paid. This is in contrast with the City’s <br />audited year-end financial report which attempts to measure revenues earned but not collected, as well <br />as costs incurred but not yet paid. It should be noted that many of the City’s revenue streams such as <br />property taxes, are non-recurring or are received intermittently throughout the year. This can result in <br />wide revenue fluctuations from month to month. In addition, some of the City’s expenditures such as <br />new capital purchases are also non-recurring and subject to wide fluctuations. To accommodate these <br />differences, a comparison is made to historical results to identify whether any new trends exist. Staff <br />reviewed the balances of the general fund and other capital funds for the second quarter in further detail <br />and recommended the Council accept the interim financials. <br />Councilmember Burg asked what caused the franchise fee to be delayed from January to March. City <br />Manager Lotter believed there was a minor delay in implementing the new bill. <br />Councilmember Burg requested further information on the miscellaneous category. Finance Director Davitt <br />provided further information on this fund to the City Council. <br />Councilmember Burg was pleased that the water revenue had not been impacted in a negative way given the <br />fact there was a watering ban and drought this spring. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen was pleased there were no surprises in the interim financials. <br />Mayor Johnson appreciated the fact that the City was right on track with its finances through the second <br />quarter. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Council Business <br />1. Consideration of <br />Acceptance of Interim <br />Financial Statements <br />for the Second Quarter <br />of 2016. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />