Laserfiche WebLink
September 13, 2016 Page 4 of 7 <br />second Tuesday of the month). The date, time and place for the scheduled public hearings will <br />be included on the County’s parcel specific notices. He reported the recommended 2017 <br />General Fund Budget is $15,106,600 which represents an increase of 6.31% over the 2016 <br />Amended Budget. The recommended budget includes: <br /> <br /> No use of reserves for operations <br /> Continued reallocation of LGA for Street Reconstruction and Stormwater purposes <br /> New personnel requests in Park Maintenance, IT, and License Bureau <br /> New personnel reclassification requests in Administration, Recreation, and NBCC <br /> Funding to perform a 2017 Community Survey <br /> Funding to update a City-wide Comprehensive Plan <br /> Funding for capital asset replacements <br /> <br />City Manager Lotter discussed the efforts the City has made to run more efficiently. He <br />reviewed how staff has worked to reduce expenses over the past eight years through the <br />economic downturn. The 2017 proposed levy was compared to neighboring communities. He <br />then commented on the how the proposed levy would impact the median valued homeowner. <br />He reported the 2017 Budget components reflect the City Council adopted priorities, those <br />being: financial sustainability, effective governance, community engagement, economic <br />development, operational excellence and workforce engagement and development. He <br />discussed the items included and not included within the budget and tax levy in further detail. <br />The resources available to assist residents with property tax relief were listed. Staff <br />recommended approval of the preliminary tax levy and meeting dates. <br />Councilmember Strub was pleased to see the progress the City was making through new parks, new roads, <br />new homes, new jobs and new bridges in the community. He indicated he spoke with his neighbors <br />regarding the City’s role and he believed New Brighton was providing high quality public services in a cost <br />efficient manner. He supported the proposed tax levy and believed it provided a great return on investment. <br />Councilmember Bauman appreciated Councilmember Strub’s comments, however, it was her opinion the <br />COLA adjustments was excessive along with the salaries being paid to staff when reflected against the <br />earnings of the average New Brighton resident. She reported that over 12% of the City’s population were <br />living in poverty, which was higher than the State average. She understood the City had an obligation to <br />provide core services but did not believe this would be sustainable with budgets that had a 6+% increase year <br />after year. She noted the City received $582,000 in LGA this year. She recommended the City not bank on <br />these funds continuing. She believed the budget was excessive and that the City needed to be more fiscally <br />responsible. For this reason, she stated she would not be supporting the proposed tax levy. <br />Councilmember Strub stated Councilmember Bauman discussed the idea of suburban poverty at a previous <br />worksession meeting. He appreciated this discussion and welcomed this topic being discussed further. He <br />provided clarification on the data Councilmember Bauman discussed noting over 5% of the people living in <br />poverty within the City were children which were not tax paying individuals. He looked forward to the <br />Council discussing how to address the remaining 7% of those living in poverty within New Brighton. <br />Mayor Johnson stated she had researched this topic as well. She found that 10.2% of New Brighton residents <br />were living at the poverty level. She discussed the City’s unemployment rate and believed local businesses <br />were not cutting staff or wages at this time as the economy was on an upturn. She understood that a large <br />portion of those living in poverty were renters and suggested the Council look into providing more affordable <br />housing. <br />Councilmember Burg commented on those that qualify for a real estate tax refund. She noted she worked <br />daily in her career to find housing for homeless and low income individuals. She described how the City was <br />setting aside LGA funds in order to reduce the need for future debt. <br />Mayor Johnson addressed the proposed COLA increases and noted Lino Lakes city employees would be <br />receiving 2.5% increases. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />