Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: February 11, 2016 <br />CASE: ZA2016-001 <br />SUBJECT: Creation of a Shoreland Ordinance as Chapter 12 to the New Brighton <br />Zoning Code <br />APPLICANT: City of New Brighton <br /> <br />REQUEST & BACKGROUND <br />The City is initiating adoption of a Shoreland Ordinance as a new Article 1, Chapter 12 to the <br />New Brighton Zoning Code. This ordinance would create a Shoreland Overlay District for any <br />property that lies within 1,000’ of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of a Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources (DNR) regulated lake (Long Lake, Pike Lake, Rush Lake, <br />Poplar Lake, and Jones Lake) and within 300’ of Rice Creek. The purpose of a Shoreland <br />Ordinance, as provided under Minnesota Statutes 103F.201, is to provide guidance for the wise <br />development of shoreland of public waters and thus preserve and enhance the quality of surface <br />waters, to preserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands, and to provide <br />for the wise use of water and related land resources of the state. <br /> <br />Since 1990, all cities having shoreland within their corporate boundaries have been required to <br />adopt a DNR approved shoreland ordinance. These requirements are established under <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 103F.221. To date, New Brighton has not adopted an ordinance. <br />While the DNR has not taken enforcement action against the City, that option is available under <br />State law. Enforcement action could entail the DNR adopting an ordinance on the City’s behalf <br />if the City fails to enact an ordinance. A City Attorney memo dated 7/18/2013 (attached) <br />outlines this issue in more detail. <br /> <br />Up until 2008, the Rice Creek Watershed District enforced a shoreland rule. That shoreland rule <br />was rescinded in 2008. During the City’s last update to the our Surface Water Management Plan <br />(August 2012), the RCWD commented that the City must adopt a Shoreland Ordinance. Also, <br />since 2008 at least one lakeshore owner has requested a building permit to construct a building <br />within 50’ of a lake, which is prohibited under shoreland rules. Because of all of these reasons, <br />the City is taking steps at this time to adopt a DNR-approved Shoreland Ordinance to ensure the <br />City is living up to its obligations under State law. These details are explained further in the <br />previously mentioned City Attorney memo dated 7/18/2013. <br /> <br />At the Council’s direction, staff has worked to draft a proposed ordinance that has the least <br />amount of impact to our residents. There are many deviations from the DNR’s model Shoreland <br />Ordinance in New Brighton’s proposed ordinance. These deviations must be accepted by the <br />DNR. Staff has submitted New Brighton’s draft Shoreland Ordinance to the DNR, who provided <br />comment via email on January 28, 2016. Additionally, the City Attorney has also reviewed the <br />draft ordinance. The City Attorney comments are attached to this memo as Attachment A and <br />the DNR comments are attached as Attachment C (comments noted in the right-hand column of <br />the documents). <br /> <br />The Planning Commission has been reviewing the impacts of the draft ordinance for the past <br />year. Two work sessions have been held on May 19, 2015 and June 16, 2015. Also, an Open <br />House was conducted on September 29, 2015, where 1,518 property owners within the defined <br />shoreland were notified by mail and invited to attend. To date, staff has fielded approximately <br />75 phone and email inquiries and an additional 100 or so residents attended the September Open <br />House. The information presented at the September 29, 2015 Open House is attached as