Laserfiche WebLink
NONCONFORMING USE PERMIT ANALYSIS <br />The applicant is requesting a Nonconforming Use Permit to allow existing nonconformities to <br />remain. Those nonconformities consist of the following: <br />• 0’ parking lot setback to the north and south side yards, when 5’ is required. <br />• 15’ front yard parking lot setback, when 30’ is normally required. <br />• Lack of appropriate exterior materials on the street side of the structure. <br />• Curb cuts not meeting separation requirements. <br /> <br />Zoning Code Section 8-460 (2) states that nonconforming use permits may only be granted if one <br />or more of the following conditions are met (staff responses in italics): <br />A) The total number of nonconformities is reduced. <br /> <br />Staff finds this criterion to be met. The applicant is removing bituminous parking within the <br />5’ side yard setbacks to the north and south, eliminating two nonconforming parking lot <br />setbacks. <br /> <br />The applicant notes in the narrative provided that the 30’ front yard setback is met. This is <br />inaccurate as the drive-aisle to access that parking does not meet setback, which is required. <br />However, staff understands the need to have a row of parking in the front yard so it isn’t <br />likely the 30’ setback could be me while also retaining those front yard stalls. <br /> <br />B) The impact of any nonconformity upon adjacent premises is reduced to the greatest <br />practical extent. <br /> <br />Staff finds this criterion to be met. Removing bituminous in the north and south required side <br />yards will positively impact the immediately adjacent neighbors. Additionally, the applicant <br />will be installing new exterior materials and improving the overall aesthetic quality of the <br />building, positively impacting the neighborhood and Old Highway 8 corridor. <br /> <br />C) The extent of any nonconformity is reduced where practical. <br /> <br />Staff finds this criterion to be partially met. The standards in Section 8-460 (2) only require <br />one or more of the standards to be met in order to grant approval, which the applicant has <br />met. However, the curb cuts do not meet separation requirements. Zoning Code Section 11- <br />020 (8) (E) requires a separation of 50’ between curb cuts, but only 25’ exists. This standard <br />could be met, or the nonconformity could be reduced if the applicant narrowed the existing <br />curb cut widths. Staff has discussed this option with the applicant, but based on the written <br />narrative provided he is unwilling to reduce the widths of these access points. Staff is <br />inclined to accept that position at this time, however, the applicant should be put on notice <br />any future improvements to Old Highway 8 NW will likely require reductions in curb cut <br />width and/or closure of an access point. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the Nonconforming Use Permit. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />