My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017.03.21 Planning
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2017
>
2017.03.21 Planning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2018 11:41:18 AM
Creation date
1/11/2018 10:09:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Janice Gundlach <br />From:Sonsalla, Sarah J. <SSonsalla@Kennedy-Graven.com> <br />Sent:Thursday, March 16, 2017 2:16 PM <br />To:Janice Gundlach <br />Cc:Sonsalla, Sarah J. <br />Subject:RE: Temp Housing License <br />Dear Janice, <br /> <br />I reviewed the questions. My responses are written in red below. Let me know if you have any questions or if you need <br />any other information. <br /> <br />Thanks! <br /> <br />Sarah <br /> <br />Sarah J. Sonsalla | Attorney | Kennedy & Graven, Chartered |470 U.S. Bank Plaza | 200 South Sixth Street | Minneapolis, MN <br />55402 |direct: 612.337.9284 | fax: 612.337.9310 | e‐mail: ssonsalla@kennedy‐graven.com <br /> <br />From: Janice Gundlach [mailto:Janice.Gundlach@newbrightonmn.gov] <br />Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 10:36 AM <br />To: Sonsalla, Sarah J. <br />Subject: Temp Housing License <br /> <br />Good Morning Sarah, <br /> <br />The Planning Commission last month reviewed the latest draft ordinance on temporary family health care dwellings and <br />they had a lot of concerns/questions on the Removal Agreement. I’m wondering if you can help me address some of <br />their questions, or at least verify if my conclusions are reasonable and/or accurate. I think the biggest concern is what if <br />the Removal Agreement isn’t honored and how does that issue resolve itself. <br /> <br />Here are a couple of concerns the PC had (bulleted items) and a staff comment in italics. Does this seem accurate? Do <br />you have anything to add? <br /> <br /> What if the Removal Agreement isn’t honored and the temp dwelling continues to persist after the license has <br />expired? <br /> <br />Response: The City will not issue a license for the temporary dwelling until the applicant signs the removal <br />agreement and provides the City with a financial guarantee of $1500. In the removal agreement, the <br />licensee will agree that in the event that he or she does not remove the dwelling at the end of the license <br />period or if the dwelling becomes non‐compliant with the City Code for some reason and the violations are <br />not remedied, that the City may enter the property and remove the dwelling. In the event that the City <br />needs to remove the dwelling, it will be able to do so without having to seek further permission from the <br />license holder because the license holder already signed the removal agreement agreeing to this. The City <br />may then use the financial guarantee to pay for the costs that it incurs in removing the dwelling. In the <br />event the City incurs more than $1500 in costs, it can assess those additional costs against the property. <br /> <br />o The City would likely issue a misdemeanor citation for violation of the license requirements. We’d issue <br />this citation to both the occupant and the property owner of which the dwelling is location on. The City
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.