Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />Approved 6-0. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Frischman, seconded by Commissioner Miwa, to recess the Planning <br />Commission meeting at 7:11 p.m. <br /> <br />Approved 6-0. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner McPherson, seconded by Commissioner Danger, to reconvene the Planning <br />Commission meeting at 7:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Approved 6-0. <br /> <br />Information and Discussion (discussion moved to work session room): <br />(A) Draft Ordinance concerning Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings <br /> <br />Planning Director Janice Gundlach reviewed the most recently revised draft of the Temporary Family Health <br />Care Dwelling License Ordinance. The draft is in track change format allowing revisions to be easily identified. <br />These changes were requested at the February 21st Planning Commission work session discussion. Beyond <br />these minor revisions, Commissioners expressed concerns regarding the Removal Agreement and legal <br />implications on a variety of “what if” scenarios involving non-compliance with the ordinance rules. Staff has <br />discussed these concerns with the City Attorney and finds no additional ordinance revisions are necessary at this <br />time. To ensure the Commission’s concerns were appropriately addressed, staff provided the Commissioner <br />concerns to the City Attorney via email, to which the City Attorney provided written responses back. <br /> <br />Planning Director Gundlach stated staff is recommending the Commission discuss the draft ordinance and the <br />City Attorney feedback on legal concerns and determine if additional ordinance revisions are necessary. The <br />next step would be to schedule a public hearing at the next Planning Commission meeting. While a public <br />hearing isn’t technically required because this ordinance will become part of the City Code, and not the Zoning <br />Code, staff is recommending the hearing process as the license does have some effect on land use (albeit <br />temporarily). Additionally, the opt-out ordinance previously adopted by Council would need to be rescinded. <br /> <br />Planning Director Gundlach explained that in order for the ordinance to take effect, the Council will need to <br />adopt it following a Commission hearing and recommendation. After Council adoption, the ordinance would <br />need to be published in the official City newspaper. If the Commission wishes, the ordinance could be moved <br />forward for public hearing on April 18th, with the Council then slated to consider on April 25th, and a <br />publication occurring on May 3rd. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deick noted a small grammatical change within the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner McPherson questioned how many requests the City anticipated receiving on a yearly basis. <br />Planning Director Gundlach didn’t know for sure but anticipated the City may only get one request per year, or <br />maybe even none. She explained that if the City were to receive numerous requests, the Ordinance could be <br />amended if any concerns were to arise. <br /> <br />Commissioner McPherson asked if a sunset clause should be placed within the Ordinance if no requests were <br />made of the City. Planning Director Gundlach explained she could discuss this with the City Attorney. <br />