My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017.05.16 Planning
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2017
>
2017.05.16 Planning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2018 11:41:18 AM
Creation date
1/11/2018 11:25:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Public Safety Department had reviewed the Planning Case and because the school was proposed to have only <br />300 students a School Resource Officer was not being requested. She explained if Police calls to the school <br />were to become an issue this would be addressed by school staff and the Public Safety Department. <br /> <br />Commissioner Murphy questioned if the two buildings within the seminary proposed for school use were <br />currently vacant. Planning Director Gundlach recommended this question be addressed by the applicant. Peter <br />Beck, United Theological Seminary, explained the library was currently a library and the McMillan building <br />had classrooms. He reported these buildings had an abundance of space available. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nichols-Matkaiti asked if the cafeteria space would be shared by the K-8 students and the <br />seminary. Mr. Beck stated this was the case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Danger inquired if this would be considered a private school. Mr. Beck stated it could be a <br />private or magnet/charter school. <br /> <br />Commissioner Danger questioned if there were any specifications that would require the school offer special <br />education classes. Mr. Beck commented he had no tenant at this time, but had real estate agents looking for a <br />tenant. He stated he had no restrictions on the classes offered except for the potential school size must remain <br />around 300 students or less. <br /> <br />Commissioner Danger asked if the seminary enrollment was down and this had led to the Special Use Permit <br />request. Mr. Beck reported this was the case. He discussed how the dynamics of higher education were <br />changing which was leading to the downsizing of the seminary campus. He believed the additional space on <br />campus would be best utilized by a K-8 school. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fynewever inquired if these two communities could cohesively coexist, and if there were any <br />other instances in the State or nation where a college and elementary school shared the same campus. Planning <br />Director Gundlach reported she was not aware of any instances in the State or nation. Mr. Beck commented <br />50+ years ago he attended a college where a K-9 school was located on the same campus in St. Cloud, <br />Minnesota. <br /> <br />Commissioner Danger questioned the demographics of the seminary school. Lew Zeidner, President of United <br />Theological Seminary, discussed the demographics of his students noting the ages ranged from 25 to 60, with <br />the majority of students being mid-career. He stated he had 80 students on-campus at this time. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nichols-Matkaiti requested further comment on the outdoor playground. Mr. Beck reviewed the <br />proposed and location of for the playground and commented on feedback received from the neighborhood <br />meeting. For safety purposes, he recommended the playground location remain as is. He stated if the <br />playground were to locate to the southwest this would require the prairie area to be destroyed. He believed that <br />the potential should not be restricted to using the campus only five nights per year. He suggested this number <br />be increased to 12. In addition, he requested the school be allowed to function from 7 am to 7 pm on a daily <br />basis. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nichols-Matkaiti asked if the playground area would be fenced. Mr. Beck stated he was not <br />requesting a fence at this time, but was uncertain if the tenant would want to make this request. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nichols-Matkaiti questioned what times of day the playground would be used. Mr. Beck <br />anticipated the playground area would be primary used for recess time after lunch. However, he stated he
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.