Laserfiche WebLink
• Rents under a 4% tax credit project are set as affordable at or below 60% AMI (area median <br />income). Developers believe market rents in our area are comparable to the affordability criteria <br />under the 60% AMI already. <br />• Market rate multi-family may be viable, but the construction costs per square foot exceed market <br />rents in the area. New construction costs are over $2/SF with market rate rents in the area at <br />approximately $1.80/SF. TIF, grants or land write-down could close this gap. <br />• Most developers are not concerned about competing projects in Arden Hills, Roseville, or <br />Shoreview, especially on the affordable projects, due to high demand. <br />• Dominium shared that units priced at 60% AMI are most cost effective for their model of new <br />construction, and for every 10% reduction in AMI (so going from 60% AMI to 50% AMI) comes a <br />needed public subsidy of an additional $35,000/unit. <br />• Demand remains for the townhome product Pulte built in The Enclave at New Brighton Exchange. <br />The average sale price of these units was approximately $300,000. <br />• Land likely could sell between $5,000/unit - $15,000/unit, depending on product-type and other <br />financial details. <br /> <br />Learning what we’ve learned thus far, the City will likely need to create a TIF district to realize an <br />affordable project, a market rate project, and even owner-occupied units. However, the length the district <br />would need to be open to repay the City’s investment and/or provide additional subsidy varies greatly <br />across product-types. <br /> <br />Following in-person meetings with developers, staff sent emails to the 12 interested developers on March <br />1, 2018, asking for the following information: <br />• A written narrative explaining what would be proposed to be built, timing of construction, <br />typical development amenities, and level of interior and exterior finishes, <br />• A concept site plan depicting what property would be requested (all or only a portion) and how <br />the developer would envision laying building(s) out on the site, <br />• A rough idea on what the developer would propose paying for the land, and <br />• Funding sources and funding gap requests. <br />This information is being requested by March 26, 2018. The intent is to review received proposals <br />internally by the end of March, then with the EDC on April 4, 2018. The EDC will be tasked with making <br />a recommendation on a development partnership for Council consideration later in April. <br />Staff will prepared to address questions regarding the information contained in this memo and advises <br />the Commission to review this information and provide any feedback for group discussion. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />