Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />(2) 2040 Comprehensive Plan Rezonings <br /> <br />(a) Adoption of an Ordinance Rezoning property located at 2770 and 2750 I-694 Service Drive <br />from B-1 to R-3B (PIDs 19-30-23-34-0008 and 19-30-23-34-0009) in conformance with the <br />City’s new 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This area, known as the Benedictine Health Center <br />campus, is guided for “Mixed Use Regional” development by the new Comprehensive Plan, and <br />the proposed rezoning would allow for consideration of a Planned Residential Development in <br />compliance with the new Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola reported State law provides cities <br />with nine months to update zoning ordinances and maps following approval of a new comprehensive <br />plan. The recently approved 2040 Comp Plan has initiated that time clock, and approval of these two <br />ordinances (865 & 866) will be the first step in meeting the City’s legal obligations. Both ordinances <br />are needed at this time to allow developers to initiate the application process. Delaying either project <br />(provided they meet the goals and objectives of the new plan) serves no public purpose. The need for <br />additional housing in the City was discussed. Staff commented further on the Benedictine Health <br />Center development and recommended approval of Ordinance 865 approving the rezoning. It was <br />noted the Ordinance would only grant conditional approval. <br />Commissioner Frischman asked what the density differences were for Mixed Use Regional versus <br />Mixed Use Neighborhood. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola explained <br />the Mixed Use Regional zoning had a minimum of 12 units per acre and a maximum of 50. He reported <br />the Mixed Use Neighborhood properties were guided for 8 to 40 units per acre. <br />Chairperson Nichols-Matkaiti opened the Public Hearing at 7:48 p.m. <br />Rick Dietrich, 775 8th Avenue NE, stated he was a block away from the proposed development at the <br />old New Brighton Elementary School. He explained he did not support the proposed zoning change. <br />He questioned why the City had to be in compliance with the Met Council. <br />Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola explained that the City is required to <br />be in compliance with its Comprehensive Plan. He reported the City gathered feedback from the public <br />to prepare the document, and it was reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the City <br />Council. The document is now being reviewed by the Met Council for final approval. <br />Mr. Dietrich stated he did not believe this area of the City had to be developed quite so densely. He <br />was of the opinion the proposed development would not be keeping in character with the existing <br />homes that were built in the 1940’s and 1950’s. He recommended the City reconsider the density of <br />the proposed development. In addition, he feared his home value would decrease given the close <br />proximity of the high-density development to his home. He encouraged the City to buck the trend and <br />pursue another type of development other than high-density apartments. <br />