My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019.04.02 Planning Commission
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2019
>
2019.04.02 Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2021 1:56:11 PM
Creation date
2/16/2021 10:28:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nonconforming Use Permit – 23 15th Ave SW <br />Planning Commission Report; 4-2-19 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />Notable Code <br />Definitions: <br /> SETBACK. The minimum horizontal distance from a building, structure, fence, <br />or parking lot to a lot line. <br /> <br />Applicable <br />Codes: <br /> Chapter 4, Article 1, R-1 District. <br />Identifies minimum setbacks in R-1 districts. <br /> <br />Applicant’s <br />Narrative: <br /> <br />I am the remodeling contractor hired by Lynell Gupta, resident and owner of the property located at <br />23 15th Avenue SW, New Brighton. Ms Gupta has intended to do a major remodel of her property, <br />which will include an addition to the rear portion of her property, cosmetic updates to the front and <br />side portions of her property. <br /> <br />After the paid application for a Building Permit had been submitted, your zoning department had <br />informed me that the front setback is now out of conformance per the city code specifications and <br />has deemed the property as a non-conforming property. A variance is now required for the proposed <br />improvements, even though the remodel is not within the “non-conforming” portion of the property. <br />I request the variance be permitted. <br /> <br />I also feel compelled to state that this is a ridiculous request. This is an approved and established <br />neighborhood with front setbacks that appear to align all the house. To my untrained eye – it <br />appears that the setback was different when plotting this neighborhood versus the current code. I <br />feel that this should be a “Grandfathered” rather than a variance activity. You not only delay the <br />remodeling process but cost your own resident additional and unnecessary costs. <br /> <br /> <br />Nonconforming Use Permit Review <br />In General: A nonconforming use permit is required due to the front of the existing home being <br />within the 30-foot front yard setback. Per Chapter 8, Article 4 of the zoning code, the <br />legal nonconforming structure (house) is considered a Type 4 Nonconformity, and <br />therefore new construction must be reviewed and authorized by the City Council prior <br />to staff issuing a building permit. <br /> <br />Criteria Review: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Zoning Code Section 8-460 contains three standards the City must review prior to <br />authorizing continuance of a Type 4 nonconformity. Per code, permission to continue <br />the nonconformity may be granted only if one or more of the following conditions are <br />met <br />1. The total number of nonconformities is reduced. <br />STAFF COMMENTS: The total number of nonconformities (1) will be unchanged <br />as a result of the proposed work. The proposed project is completely unrelated to <br />the legal nonconforming front yard setback, and cannot solve the existing problem.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.