My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019.05.21 Planning Commission
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2019
>
2019.05.21 Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2021 1:56:11 PM
Creation date
2/16/2021 10:33:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
521
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preliminary Planned Residential Development <br />Planning Commission Report; 5-21-19 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 25 <br />(cont.) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4. There’s a perception by some that the Better Business Bureau is a government <br />program designed to protect consumers. That’s not the case. They are a private <br />business with a very well-recognized trademark. While the City will take no <br />position either way, people are encouraged to research articles on the modern <br />Better Business Bureau and come to their own judgements on BBB ratings vis-a- <br />vis accredited vs. non-accredited businesses. Neither Dominium nor Pulte pay <br />the annual fee for BBB accreditation. <br />5. Giving the BBB the full benefit of the doubt that accreditation has no impact on <br />their ratings, staff would still call out the following points with regards to <br />Dominium’s alleged “F” rating: <br />A. Dominium is a large company, and those voicing concerns are ignoring the <br />fact that there are two ratings for MN Dominium on the BBB website: one <br />for the management services arm of the company (which is listed as an “F”), <br />and one for construction services which is rated A+. If one accepts the “F” <br />rating as being legitimate, then you must also accept the A+ rating as being <br />indicative of the company, and this application is specifically brought <br />forward by the A+ rated portion of the company. <br />B. Regarding the “F” rating for the management services side of the company, <br />it is suggested that people look at what is being rated, the numbers behind <br />those ratings, and at the actual complaints themselves. It is also important to <br />note that the management services page identifies Dominium as a “multi- <br />location business,” meaning the BBB is intending to rate the management <br />services over the entirety of the United States, and are not giving a rating <br />specific to Minnesota. <br />As of 5/10/19 when staff completed our research to compile this report, <br />there were 31 complaints filed with the BBB over the last three years from <br />various states. Dominium manages more than 30,000 apartments in 22 <br />states. If each unit was given only a single chance to complain in any given <br />year, that means up to 90,000 complaints could have been received over a <br />three-year period, so the 31 BBB complaints actually received equates to a <br />complaint rate of 0.038%. <br />Assuming Dominium accepts more than one complaint per unit per year <br />(because they do), but for the sake of argument we’ll say they only do so on <br />weekdays, that’s a chance for 261 potential complaints per unit per year. <br />With that as the understanding, the hit rate on complaints falls to an <br />astronomically low 0.00014% per day. Math suggests that a really good <br />track record. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.