Laserfiche WebLink
Ord 892: Rental Licensing Requirements <br />City Council Work Session Initial DRAFT Review; 7-12-22 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />• Lines 253 – 289. License denial, suspension, or revocation. This section provides clarity on how the city will <br />make decisions regarding licenses, the process to be used, effects of decisions, and the rights of owners and <br />tenants during the denial / suspension / revocation process. <br />o Lines 254 – 289: Grounds for Denial, Suspension, or Revocation. These lines identify 16 different reasons <br />the City can use to justify denying a license, or taking a previously approved license away from an owner. <br />Having pre-defined justifications to act against a license will provide a solid legal defense should the City <br />ever be sued by an applicant or license holder. This expands upon the current list outlined in Section 13- <br />164(1) of the present ordinance. <br />o Lines 290 – 294: Revocation and Suspension Options. This subsection gives Council options when acting <br />against an issued license (i.e. there can be a middle ground whereby a license is temporarily suspended until <br />issues are addressed). <br />o Lines 295 – 302: Notice. This subsection describes the notice process the City will implement to make sure <br />an owner knows their license may be suspended or revoked, and clarifies that while there will be a hearing <br />before the City Council, the hearing will not be an official public hearing as defined in statutes which require <br />mailed notice to surrounding properties and publication in the City’s official paper. The number of calendar <br />days’ notice to the license holder can be raised or lowered (while more research can be done to confirm, I <br />believe we’ve seen as low as 7 days and as high as 20 days in other ordinances). Ultimately legal will be <br />asked to weigh in on any standard we propose. <br />o Lines 303 – 309: Hearing. This subsection describes the hearing and how it will be conducted. Council’s <br />determination can be made upon a “preponderance of the evidence” (i.e. Council believes there is a greater <br />than 50% chance that the issues of concern are legitimate). <br />o Lines 310 – 323: Final Decision. This subsection outlines the Council’s options upon conclusion of the <br />hearing. Within this section, we set up an option whereby Council can order that rent payable during the <br />suspension or revocation be paid into an escrow account to be maintained by the City. Those funds could <br />then be used to pay for costs of abating violations at the property, and remaining funds would be returned <br />once all issues had been addressed. While not something the City would ever want to employ, having the <br />option will be an important tool in the right circumstances. Timeframes for when a new license can be <br />acquired on lines 321 and 322 should be discussed. <br />o Lines 324 – 331: Appeal of decision to deny or not renew. This subsection describes an owners rights if <br />staff decides to deny a license application. <br />o Lines 332 – 337: Notification to Tenants / No New Rentals. This subsection states that the City will notify <br />tenants if their unit or building is affected by a suspended or revoked license, and prohibits the licensee <br />from letting, renting, or allowing otherwise vacant units to be occupied during the suspension or revocation.