Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Proceedings - December 22, 1998 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Current PUD regulations state there shall be a minimum setback of the height of the <br />building, or 30 ft. whichever is greater, from all property lines which form the perimeter <br />of the PUD. The amendment allows flexibility for any new PUD, subject to Council <br />approval under the conditions that pedestrian linkages to neighboring developments is <br />provided along with an approved streetscape plan. <br /> <br />These minor amendments allow structures to be located closer to the perimeters of a new <br />PRD or PUD. This is consistent with development envisioned in the Hwy 8 Plan, <br />Downtown New Brighton, and the MX District. If a structure within a proposed PUD <br />or PRD is within the required 25-30 ft. setback area, then pedestrian access to the entire <br />development, and streetscape enhancements including tree planting, landscaping and <br />lighting would need to be provided, otherwise a 25-30 ft. setback would be required. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Hoffman, to APPROVE THE ORDINANCE <br />AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER VII OF THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE TO <br />ALLOW FLEXIBILITY IN THE PERIMETER SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR <br />ANY NEW PUD OR PRD UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Teague presented the PUD for Outlot A of Brighton Corporate Park III located north of <br />Co. Rd. E-2 Ext., west of 5th Ave., and south of 6th St. The project includes a mixture <br />of commercial, office and retail uses. The design has been planned to allow integration <br />with the future residential development to be located directly north. The residential <br />project would be upper end market rate apartments, and condominiums and senior <br />housing may be considered. The residential project will require separate PUD approval <br />at a future date. Only the commercial/office project is under consideration at this time. <br /> <br />The proposal involves 80,850 sq. ft of commercial/office development and 32,000 sq. ft <br />of underground parking. The following uses are proposed: convenience store with gas <br />sales and car wash - 4,000 sq. ft., restaurant - 3,000 sq. ft., restaurant - 1,500 sq. ft., <br />Post Office - 4,000 sq. ft., bank, child care facility, office, and retail. Pedestrian <br />linkages and a streetscape plan are included in the proposal. The landscaping is being <br />performed by Damon Faber who is also doing the Old Hwy 8 Corridor streetscape. <br />Parking requirements have been satisfied. The development would qualify as a joint-use <br />facility in which total number of parking spaces could be less than the total required. <br />However, this is not proposed at this time. The Fire Marshal recommends hydrants be <br />placed near the midpoint of the Co. Rd. E-2 Extension and the future 6th St. Extension. <br /> <br />The convenience store canopy will be blocked from view of the residential property, and <br />lighting will be recessed so not to be visible to adjacent properties. To prevent the car <br />wash noise, the exit door must be closed during operation, and may not be opened until <br />all machines are turned off. At this time, no signage has been proposed. All signage <br />must meet the provisions of the sign ordinance. <br /> <br />Under the plan for Outlot A, a retaining wall will be installed on the property held by <br />the City. The wall will not be constructed until Building C is ready to be built. <br />Potentially, the wall will not be needed depending upon the timing of the residential <br />project. Grading plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer, and <br />the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Perimeter setbacks for <br />PUD and PRD <br />Report 98-244 <br />Ordinance 650 <br /> <br />;. <br /> <br />PUD - Pratt/Ordway <br />Co. Rd. E-2 and 5th <br />Ave. <br />Report 98-245 <br />Resolution 98-113 <br />