1998-12-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I Council Proceedings - December 22, 1998 Page 7 Council Business. continued Benke asked if Council could approve the rezoning of the AAA site, but delay action to March 1, 1999, to allow for site plan review. Teague confirmed that staff could work with AAA to develop the site and landscape plans, and address the non-conformities. The Planning Commission would make recommendations on February 23, 1999. If agreement is not reached, an amendment to the ordinance would be required. LeFevere added that if Council preferred more information or if AAA requested a delay, a final decision could be made at a subsequent meeting. Depending on Council wishes, statements referring to special treatment for certain non-conformities within a MX District could be added. Larson noted concern that the number of fueling bays seems to change. Benke feels the proposed recommendation would allow ample time to review the site plan to give Council a better idea of the AAA proposal. Community Development Director Kevin Locke feels there could be a method to allow interim fueling on-site, and believes Plalming Commission input will be of great value. Larson added that any Council approved site plan between January 1, 1985 and the ordinance's effective date for property in this area must be completed by January 1, 2005. Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Samuelson, to AUTHORIZE STAFF TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES FROM B-3 (GENERAL BUSINESS), 1-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL), 1-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL), AND 1-3 (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) TO MX (MIXED USE) FOR APPROVAL AT THE JANUARY 7,1999, COUNCIL MEETING WITH THE EXEMPTION OF THE U.S. FILTER SITE (1950 OLD HIGHWAY 8) AND THE BEBET REALTY SITE (50 14TH STREET NW); AUTHORIZE STAFF TO DRAFT AL TERNA TIVE ORDINANCES RELATIVE TO THE REZONING OF THE BEBET REALTY SITE; AUTHORIZE STAFF TO DEVELOP AL TERNA TIVE ZONING OPTIONS FOR THE DECOSTER SITE (1823 OLD HIGHWAY 8) TO ALLOW GASOLINE SALES. 5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. Teague presented an ordinance amendment to allow flexibility in the requirement for perimeter setbacks for Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Planned Unit Development (PUD). This amendment is an implementation tool of the Vision which calls for buildings to be located closer to streets, improved streetscapes with pedestrian walkways in front of buildings, and parking provided on the street and behind buildings. Current PRO regulations state there shall be a minimum setback of the height of the building or 25 ft., whichever is less, from all properties lines which form the perimeter of the PRD. The amendment allows flexibility for any new PRD, subject to Council approval under the conditions that pedestrian linkages to neighboring developments is provided along with an approved streetscape plan. Council Business Rezoning of properties MX District Report 98-243 Ordinance 649 Perimeter setbacks for PUD and PRD Report 98-244 Ordinance 650