Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />April 14, 1998 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />The biggest factor in the Sewer Utility is the treatment costs performed by Metropolitan <br />Council Environmental Services (MCES), In 1998, that cost would be in excess of <br />$1,000,000. Customer charges would be $2.35 and of that $1.44 would be payment <br />turn backed to MCES, This cost increase is very significant because there is greater <br />discharge which translates to higher costs. <br /> <br />The 1998 Revenues for the Stormwater Utility are as follows: TIF/Assessments- <br />47%/$310,000; Customer Charges - 31 %/$200,000; and County/MSA - 22%/ <br />$141,000. The 1998 Expenses are: Capital/Other - 99%/$854,000; and Operating Costs <br />- 1 %/$9,000. Changing capital needs makes rate analysis difficult, and lack of reserves <br />makes significant rate change necessary in 1998. Costly 1998 and 1999 projects require <br />immediate collection of outside revenues (TIF/Assessments/County/MSA). <br /> <br />A sample quarterly bill for 20,000 gallons translates to $71. 70 or an increase of 3,17 % . <br />That increase can be attributed to increased MCES and Stormwater fees. Large <br />customers would see a quarterly bill of $28,615.00 or 2.48% increase, <br /> <br />Samuelson asked for further clarification of the MCES customer charges. Egan <br />explained that in 1997 City costs were higher than the MCES estimated bill. Because of <br />this, the City owed MCES which required payment in 1998. Also, the 1998 <br />consumption amount would be higher than what was budgeted. These two factors <br />caused the fee to go above $1,000,000, <br /> <br />Benke noted that from a budgeting perspective, the City showed positive results in <br />revenues. Samuelson agreed that a sample quarterly bill would increase only a few <br />dollars. Egan noted that a survey of other neighboring communities showed New <br />Brighton's rates very favorably in comparison, <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Samuelson, to WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 1998 CUSTOMER <br />CHARGES FOR THE UTILITIES. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Teague presented a Simple Plat to resubdivide Lot 1, Block 1 of BCPIII. The lot is to <br />be sold to Donatelle Plastics who will construct an office/manufacturing facility at the <br />intersection of 5th Ave. and Co. Rd. B-2 Extension, <br /> <br />Because of an incorrect legal description, the County will not accept the BCPIll plat. <br />The legal description is to be corrected, however, will not be correct by the time <br />Donatelle would like to begin construction, To allow Donatelle to begin construction <br />prior to the official filing of BCPIII, staff proposes creation of a lot using a metes and <br />bounds description, <br /> <br />Motion by Larson, seconded by Samuelson, to APPROVE SIMPLE PLAT PL-24S. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried, <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />1998 Utility Rate <br />Study <br />Report 98-081 <br />Resolution 98-041 <br /> <br />Simple Plat - PL-245 <br />Donatelle <br />Report 98-083 <br />Resolution 98-040 <br />