My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-06-10
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1996
>
1996-06-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2005 3:56:28 PM
Creation date
8/8/2005 3:26:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />June 10, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Karen Madden, 3080 Bent Tree Hills Dr., is a Crime Watch Block Captain and said <br />neighbors should contact the police when they see suspicious behavior at the park. <br /> <br />Jim Cashin, 3151 Bent Tree Hills Dr., said his property will border the trail. He noted <br />a safety concern where the trail elevation near the pond limits visibility which could <br />cause collisions between rollerbladers, skateboarders, walkers, and bikers. He <br />suggested striping to divide the traffic. Anderson said the City builds 8 ft. trails to <br />provide for safety, and it is felt that a narrower path is unsafe. Normally, a trail is not <br />marked to separate traffic because people generally stay to the right. Cashin said people <br />using the soccer field will park on Bent Tree Hills Dr. and access the park through the <br />trail which will increase traffic. Cashin feels three park accesses are sufticient and an <br />additional access in his backyard is unneeded. Anderson noted the park's parking lot, <br />and does not feel people attending an athletic event would park further away and access <br />the park through the trail. He believes people would park at McDonalds before parking <br />on Bent Tree Hills Dr. Benke said City parks which do not have parking lots experience <br />on-street parking, but this park should discourage on-street parking. <br /> <br />Jane Hastings, 3089 Bent Tree Hills Dr., supports Burleson's comments, and feels the <br />neighborhood voices have not been heard. She noted safety concerns, and truly feels the <br />homeowners were misrepresented at the time of purchase. Benke said several meetings <br />with the Park Board and Council have occurred, and Council has listened and allowed <br />public comment. The question is whether Council feels the issue should be reopened, or <br />should the original authorization persevere with the installation of the trail. <br /> <br />There was no motion to deter the installation of an asphalt trail within Innsbruck Park. <br /> <br />Fulton said moditications to the park's stormwater drainage plan were approved last <br />year. At that time, Council requested Harstad to perform moditications to the central <br />ponding area which involved dredging, removing materials, and relocating the eastern <br />trail. The City urged Harstad to perform this work in the winter. However, the City is <br />now working on a diligent basis to get the work completed as agreed upon. He said <br />Kathy Harstad is now the lead on the project and said the work will begin this week. <br /> <br />One resident asked if rock material could be placed around the pond. Benke said they <br />previously discussed rock and found it to be cost prohibitive and there were maintenance <br />issues. Anderson agreed the grassy material allows for easier maintenance. <br /> <br />One resident asked how close could the trail be built to her property, and if a <br />homeowner can become liable if someone is hurt on the trail and falls onto her property. <br />Anderson said the narrowest easement area is 16 ft. which involves an 8 ft. trail with 4 <br />ft. on either side of the property line. <br /> <br />Anderson said if someone was injured using the trail, the first question would be if the <br />trail's design caused the injury or was there any landscape feature on private property <br />which was hazardous. He acknowledged that when a lawsuit is filed it seems everyone <br />is named as a defendant. There is no way the City can grant any homeowner immunity <br />from a lawsuit. Fulton said the City Attorney's previous response to this question, was <br />that unless the homeowner has taken some type of action on their own part which has <br />caused part of the injury, the primary party responsible for that claim would be the City. <br />Benke said normal landscaping would most likely not cause injury, unless a landscape <br />feature was installed which could be hazardous to park users. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Innsbruck Trail <br />Report 96-125 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.