My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-03-26
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1996
>
1996-03-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2005 3:57:03 PM
Creation date
8/8/2005 3:30:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />March 26, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />The following five major areas of concern were central in the EDC recommendation for <br />a developer: building appearance, site grading, integration of the entire site, tinancial <br />impact, and estimated market value of the project. The EDC chose the lEG proposal <br />because it generated the greatest tax base and tax increment valuation, and worked best <br />with the site's dimcult grades. One issue relating to the Donatelle proposal was that <br />they could not economically complete the project in one phase. The EDC encouraged <br />staff to work with Donatelle, a local firm, to locate another site within the City. <br /> <br />Authorization to pursue negotiations of a development agreement with lEG should be <br />contingent on two items; the City will verify the sq. ft. price for the land, and how site <br />preparation issues will be addressed. Locke said the site is very complicated with many <br />grade changes and clearing and demolition work to be performed. Locke indicated lEG <br />will be encouraged to accommodate Warner Industries in its development. <br /> <br />Larson asked how would Donatelle address the tiber optic line issue. Locke said Opus <br />and lEG proposed that they would work around the optic line avoiding the expense to <br />relocate the line. However, Donatelle would need to relocate the line which then <br />increases the project cost by $300,000. Locke said the City will do everything possible <br />to find a location Donatelle. <br /> <br />Motion by Williams, seconded by Larson, to AUTHORIZE STAFF TO BEGIN <br />NEGOTIATIONS WITH lEG FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF BRIGHTON <br />CORPORATE PARK II. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Locke presented the building plans for the New Brighton Care Center. When Council <br />approved the agreement in 1993, the design called for a metal, peaked roof with gables. <br />The peaked roof was intended to tit in with the neighboring Rottlund Townhome project. <br />North Cities Health Care owners of the Care Center reconfirmed that peaked roof <br />design in October 1995. However, North Cities is now requesting approval for a <br />modified roof plan. The new design involves a partial peaked roof which will retain the <br />look of the original design, but greatly reduce construction costs. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Williams, to APPROVE THE AMENDED <br />BUILDING PLANS FOR THE NEW BRIGHTON CARE CENTER. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />City Manager Matthew Fulton presented the scheduling of a Branch and Wood Drop-off <br />Day on April 13. The drop-off will be located at the Public Works Garage Parking Lot. <br /> <br />The event will give residents an opportunity to dispose of ice storm tree damage, and <br />any other tree branches or wood. Proof of New Brighton residency is required, and the <br />project will be advertised in local newspapers. The anticipated project cost would be <br />$3,000, and Fulton noted that this event is unbudgeted and unanticipated. The costs to <br />provide a future City wide cleanup could run between $7,500-15,000, and because this <br />would be unbudgeted, one approach would be to include this expen.<;e in the annual <br />recycling budget. In that case, the additional annual cost to the recycling budget would <br />relate to an increase of $1.00 per property owner. It would be logical to make <br />preparation.<; for this service during the 1997 budgeting process. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Selection of Developer <br />for Brighton Corporate <br />Park II <br />Report 96-072 <br /> <br />New Brighton Care <br />Center Roof Design <br />Report 96-073 <br /> <br />Branch and Wood <br />Drop-off <br />Report 96-074 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.