86-072 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iq II' '. ;\ RESOLUTION NO. 86-72 as Amended STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON !,AMENDED RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT APPROVING NC-71. i; !: WHEREAS, an applIcation for a nonconformIng use permit was made by ,! Chenoweth Greenhouses; and il ~ ! .. ~ l ~ ~ WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a nonconfonmlng use permit was filed with the City on July 11, 1986. 2. That the Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearIng on July 15, 1986, all persons present at the hearIng were given an opportunity to be heard. 3. That the application for a nonconformIng use permit was reviewed by the City Council on July 22, 1986 and that the comments and analysis of staff and the Planning Commission minutes and recommendations were considered. 4. That the City Council amended Resolution 86-72, regarding NC-71 , on September 9, 1986 to include findings of fact that on-site construction also involved construction of an addition onto a watchman's dwelling. J! NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the following I Findings of Fact are made In respect to NC-71. 1. 2. 3. I 4. i; 1,' i :; That the site is zoned 1-1, light indisutrial. That the site has the following uses: I.) Retail floral shop, 2.) Greenhouses, 3.) One dwelling for watchman. That on-site construction involves the following: 1.) ConstructIon of new greenhouses, 2.) Remodeling and addition to the watchman's dwelling. That the site has the following Type IV nonconformlties: a. Less than required 15 foot side yard setback. b. Less than required 40 foot front yard parking and garden center setback. c. Lock of concrete curbing in a portion of front yard parking area. d. Less than required parkIng. e. Lack of front yard landscaping. 5. That the applicant has shown the total number and extent of the nonconformities will be addressed as follows: a. Provide additional parking. b. Complete the curbing around all front yard parking areas. c. Increase the side yard setback to 21 feet over 93 feet of the existing nonconformIng setback. d. Reduce the size of the temporary garden center. e. Eliminate parking in the front yard setback and increase front yard green space. 6. That the applicant has done everything practical to reduce the existing Type IV nonconformitles at this time. 7. That because of the location of the existing front retail buildings, the front yard landscaping cannot be substantially increased. " BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the appl ication NC-71, as amended, is and hereby approved subject to approval of LP-201. Adopted this 9th day of September, 1986. i: ': i Egan, ftector/City Clerk II I, 'I II ~- SEAL '