Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />June 27, 1995 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Special Order of Business. continued <br /> <br />Williams strongly differs with Pellow's view of the Met Council. He believes the one <br />thing that sets this metropolitan area apart from others is the fact it is a regional entity <br />and not comprising individual self-serving cities. This is a region which works <br />together and services airports, sewage treatment, and mass transit which would be a <br />nightmare for individual cities to manage. Pellow agrees the metropolitan cities <br />work well together. Williams reiterated that if the Met Council were removed, that <br />would be a different story. Pellow feels the Met Council is an unneeded annual <br />expense and noted the many capable individuals at the county and city level. Benke <br />agrees with Williams of the Met Council merits, and would argue for the <br />consolidation of the seven metro counties rather than the Met Council's dissolve. <br />Pellow agrees there are too many counties. Benke added there is a candidate waiting <br />for Governor appointment to the vacant New Brighton Met Council seat, and feels <br />this is an excellent opportunity for New Brighton issues to be addressed. <br /> <br />Benke said the housing and pollution cleanup bills were a product of a summit <br />conference between metropolitan mayors and Legislative leadership. This is an <br />excellent example of managing policy issues at a nonpartisan level. He asked why <br />Pellow felt these bills were not in the City's best interest. Pellow said the bills did <br />not have bipartisan support, and does not support any bill for the sole purpose of <br />reelection. Pellow feels government is the problem, not the solution. Apartment <br />buildings are being taxed at high rates which prohibit renters from eventually <br />purchasing their own home. It is not the government's role to provide affordable <br />living, and the majority share this view. He felt the Myron Orfield bill would have <br />created more bureaucracy. Benke added that his understanding of the Legislative <br />process is inconsistent with Pellow's interpretation. <br /> <br />Benke asked if insurance companies would benefit from the Worker Compensation <br />cost of living reduction. Pellow feels that if there is a windfall, insurance companies <br />would offer reduced premiums. <br /> <br />Pellow favors bills dealing with youth curfews, and noted that 80% of crimes involve <br />drug, alcohol, or domestic violence. Benke agreed that the balance between <br />prevention and punishment is an ongoing concern. Pellow said the State cannot <br />afford for the court system to solve juvenile problems. Benke asked if the new <br />combined health agency of children and education will address these issues. Pellow <br />feels that the creation of this department is a step forward. <br /> <br />Williams asked if the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) subsidy was <br />increased. Pellow has fundamental concerns with the MTC's personnel and operation <br />costs. Benke said the MTC requested an increase to keep service at current levels, <br />but received less. Williams supports a gas tax increase as a way to provide bus <br />transportation. <br /> <br />Williams does not feel the Legislature should be driven purely by the bottom dollar. <br />The Legislature needs to determine a vision of what this state should be and its needs, <br />and then identify a method to obtain revenue. Williams questioned Pellow's <br />argument of rejecting an issue merely on its cost without regard to its policy benefit. <br />Benke noted the differences of opinion and asked Pellow to discuss issues with <br />Council before the next Legislature Session. Pellow respects Williams' opinion and <br />would like to meet with Council to discuss the upcoming session. <br /> <br />Special Order of <br />Business <br /> <br />Dick Pellow <br />Legislative Update <br />