Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />February 9, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />Mike Mata, 1735--3rd St., feels the three lane ultimate five lane will <br />increase traffic, encroach onto private properties and decrease property <br />values. Mr. Eyler explained the annual traffic growth rates: the south end <br />was 3.6%, middle section was 1 %, and the north end was 5%. SRF found <br />that levels may increase or stabilize, and the striping option is a possible <br />consideration. Mr. Mata urges Council to vote against the current proposal. <br /> <br />Esther Nowlin, 196 Windsor lane and CCFSLR, appreciates Council's <br />concern for residents along the roadway. She believes the County plan is <br />excessive and its cost to the environment and tax dollars is obscene. She <br />urges Council to vote no on the County proposal. <br /> <br />Bert Emerson, 45--12th Ave., feels Silver Lake Road is not adequate for <br />bicyclists. He emphasizes for the residents along the road, but feels many <br />residents support the five lane roadway proposal. <br /> <br />Paul Urista, 321 Silver lake Road, supports the four lane road with turn <br />lanes at intersections and lights at Windsor Green. <br /> <br />Larson said the decision is not easy, but left turn lanes and areas for police <br />to patrol traffic are important. He noted the importance of the Foss House <br />historical distinction and the resident needs between 5th and 7th St. <br /> <br />Rebelein said this is one of her most difficult decisions during her Council <br />tenure. The primary issue is the City's vision for the road and its function, <br />aesthetics, traffic levels, and safety. She feels a wider road would increase <br />traffic and speed levels, negatively impact businesses, and waste Federal <br />funds. If a three lane ultimate five lane road is built, she questioned <br />whether motorists would begin to use the right lane for passing. She urged <br />Council to take a hard line on the 35 mph speed limit. She endorses the 52 <br />ft. width, stop lights at Windsor Lane and 3rd St., no negative impact to <br />homes north of 3rd St., and no encroachment to the westside between 5th <br />and 7th St. Her main concerns are the posting of the 35 mph speed limit, <br />County commitment to landscaping, and County funding for the extra stop <br />lights. <br /> <br />Williams agrees with Larson and Rebelein and thanked the City, County and <br />residents for their input. He is puzzled by the endorsements of options <br />which were discarded months ago. He believes Silver Lake Road should be <br />upgraded in a way so that it is not any less than it is today. He will not <br />vote for an action which may cause a future Council and residents to <br />reassess a future problem. He is inclined to support the proposed option <br />because it offers flexibility, provides two lanes of traffic, allows for safe left <br />and right turn lanes, provides for buses and allows for police control. He <br />feels the landscaping north of Co. Rd. E would be attractive, and noted <br />concern regarding the section between 5th and 7th St. and the depression <br />north of 3rd St. <br /> <br />Gunderman asked the possibility of legal liability to the businesses north of <br />1-694 if a reconstruction decreased traffic levels. City Attorney LeFev8re <br />does not foresee any potential legal liability. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Silver Lake Road <br />Reconstruction <br />Project <br />Report 93-039 <br />