Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />January 26, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Mattila said Mr. Strobel intends to develop his property this year and would <br />not lease the site to the Church and remains neutral. Mr. Dueck said the <br />Church's plans would not affect Mr. Strobels' plans. <br /> <br />Larson noted that Mr. Strobel's plan may involve a possible restaurant with <br />liquor license. Mattila said Mr. Strobel did mention that idea, but such a <br />use would not be permitted within 400 feet of the Church. <br /> <br />Mattila said the City's Planning and Park Departments have been cordial to <br />the applicant when supplying information, and is disappointed the applicant <br />feels they have been "stiff armed" during the process. The Fire Marshal, <br />Building Inspector and Park Director were unavailable during the holidays to <br />review technical aspects of the proposal, but this should not be viewed as <br />"stiff arming". Mattila met and provided Mr. Carson with requested <br />information just a few days ago. <br /> <br />Gunderman asked if demographics have been compiled regarding traffic <br />levels. Mr. Dueck said the City has not brought up traffic concerns to the <br />Church and have not been addressed specifically. <br /> <br />Benke requested further information of possible increased traffic levels on <br />Sundays and Wednesdays when church services are held. <br /> <br />Greg Kraupa, Eye Care Center, has been in the center for 13 years and will <br />be displaced by the Church. He attributes the center's deterioration by the <br />absence of an interested owner, and believes a facelift and aggressive on- <br />site management would revive the center and provide a tax base and <br />services to the community. The Church plan not only reduces the potential <br />services available, but affects surrounding businesses. He found the <br />Church representatives to be willing to move him to another part of the <br />center. However, they are ten other displaced tenants who will vie for the <br />few highly visible areas. The lack of visible space will force some tenants <br />to move into undesirable areas or move out altogether. He respects the <br />Church, but their good intentions will not prevent an overall negative effect <br />on New Brighton and its economy. He urged Council to deny the request. <br /> <br />Mike Olson, New Brighton Chamber of Commerce, said the Chamber <br />advances the general welfare and prosperity of New Brighton, so that its <br />residents and community shall prosper. Their position statement to the <br />Planning Commission stated the Church's occupying of the center will be a <br />detriment to the general welfare of the Center and surrounding businesses. <br />They supports staff recommendation for the denial of the special use <br />permit. The center can be substantially leased and there is growth potential <br />under proper management and ownership. The Center has proven to be <br />viable for 19 businesses currently operating, 11 have been at the center for <br />10 years or more. The Center is capable of functioning in a manner <br />adequate for these tenants. With proper ownership and commitment this <br />center has the core ingredients to develop to a point to be substantially <br />restarted. Erickson's New Market is the highest volume New Market store <br />in the Twin Cities and has a positive impact on the center. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Church Upon the <br />Rock Special Permit <br />Report 93-021 <br />