Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />June 9, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Public Hearina. continued <br /> <br />Staff investigated constructing the storm sewer to Oakwood Drive's low <br />point, and directing drainage to the low outlot in the back of homes on the <br />east side of Oakwood Drive. Also, staff investigated reduction of <br />assessments for previously assessed properties. <br /> <br />The top sub-area is the Sky High area and has 4.4 cubic feet per second <br />(cfs) of run-off. The existing storm sewer has 6.0 cfs of capacity and is <br />more than adequate, however, problems arise when the small catch basin <br />grates are plugged. This is why staff recommends installation of larger <br />grates and berming of the boulevard to force the water to the catch basins. <br /> <br />The next sub-area is the north end of Oakwood Drive. The combined run- <br />off is 8.1 cfs and the storm sewer capacity is 7.5 cfs. The storm sewer <br />here is a little undersized, but within reasonable limits. <br /> <br />At the third sub-area, the combined run-off increases to 18.5 cfs, but <br />system capacity drops to 4.8 cfs because the pipe slopes less going south <br />of 3rd St. From 3rd St. south, the run-off not carried in the storm sewer is <br />running 4 inches deep and extends to the center of the street. <br /> <br />The fourth and fifth sub-areas add a total of 31. 1 cfs and is six times the <br />storm sewer capacity. <br /> <br />The alternate plan proposes construction of the same 30 inch storm sewer <br />to the low point, but extends the 27 inch pipe to the park's southeast <br />corner. A shallow basin would be excavated to collect the park runoff and <br />funnel it to a device which sits six inches above the manhole. The plan <br />includes six large catch basins on Oakwood, one on Silver Lane and one in <br />the condominium parking lot. Estimated costs would be $55,000 and an <br />assessment rate of $1,940 per acre, and is 65% of the original plan cost. <br /> <br />Proper said the alternate plan is unreliable due to difficulty in catching <br />runoff which runs fast and deep, The alternate storm sewer could be <br />extended in the future, however, then the many catch basins are no longer <br />needed and there is wasted costs. Another concern is the park's drainage <br />basin near the sliding hill which poses a safety hazard. Also, the alternate <br />plan does not correct the backyard drainage at 1827 and 1853 3rd St. <br /> <br />Proper addressed directing drainage to an outlot behind the homes on the <br />east side of Oakwood. While runoff could be discharged, there is no cost <br />savings, and may increase costs, The same amount of pipe is required and <br />water would end up in the same 60 inch storm sewer. The only area with <br />sufficient clearance is between the homes on 301 and 349 Oakwood. <br />Putting water in this low area may create problems for surrounding homes. <br /> <br />Proper said Option A is to construct the original $84,000 project, and <br />reduce the assessments by setting a $ 500 cap on individual assessments. <br />The City would pick-up any amount over $500 which equals an additional <br />$8,278.15. The assessments would range from $202.43 to $500, as <br />compared to $202.43 to $1,235.03 for the original plan. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Storm Sewer <br />Improvement - <br />Oakwood Drive <br />Report 92-136 <br />Resolution 92-061 <br />Resolution 92-062 <br />