Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />December 10,1991 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Consent Aoenda <br /> <br />Motion by Williams, seconded by Larson, to APPROVE THE CONSENT <br />AGENDA ITEMS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />CONSOLIDATED VOUCHERS: 106594, 106596-106706, <br />106708~106720 FOR A GRAND TOTAL OF $292,137.84. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 1992 FEE <br />REGISTER. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE RENEWAL OF ALL <br />LIQUOR LICENSES. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO ISSUE A HANDBILL <br />DISTRIBUTION LICENSE TO DECORATING DEN. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Public Hearing - None <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Finance Director Margaret Egan said the Financial Policy Advisory Board <br />(FPAB) completed its review of the auditor selection policy. <br /> <br />Shirley Flekke, FPAB, said that under the terms of the original policy, <br />proposals are solicited every three years. In conducting the review, FPAB <br />surveyed 12 cities and found the current City policy progressive. FPAB <br />recommends continuation of the policy with minor language changes. <br /> <br />Williams asked if the policy ensures for an effective process of selection <br />an auditor. Ms. Flekke said the procedures include a planning process, <br />request for proposals, evaluation, and auditor selection. When combined <br />provide for an effective audit. Staff concurs with the proposed policy. <br /> <br />Motion by Williams, seconded by Larson, to WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH THE GUIDELINES FOR <br />SELECTION OF THE CITY'S AUDITOR. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Egan presented for consideration the appointment of city auditor. <br />Ms. Flekke said proposals were sent to eight firms and seven responded. <br /> <br />The panel reviewed the seven proposals and chose three finalists. Each <br />finalist made a presentation with question and answer period following. <br />The panel felt all three finalists met the minimum standards and could <br />provide an acceptable audit. The panel felt Tautges, Redpath and <br />Company demonstrated superior ability to fulfill the City's needs. <br /> <br />Consent Aaenda <br /> <br />Vouchers <br />Report 91-253 <br /> <br />1992 Fee Register <br />Report 91-254 <br />Resolution91-107 <br /> <br />Liquor Licenses <br />Report 91-255 <br /> <br />Handbill License <br />Decorating Den <br />Report 91-255A <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Revision to <br />Auditor Selection <br />Policy <br />Report 91-256 <br />Resolution91-108 <br /> <br />City Auditor <br />Appointment <br />Report 91-257 <br />Resolution91-109 <br />