Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 2 - <br /> <br />the eastern portion of the site. He also stated that parking met Code <br />requirements as there was space for two cars in the garage. <br /> <br />Mann asked if the smaller parcel to the east were part of the Super <br />Valu property. <br /> <br />The Building & Planning Coordinator replied that it is not <br />is not part of the larger parcel involved in this request. <br />that it is an entirely separate parcel. <br /> <br />and that it <br />He stated <br /> <br />At 8;10 PM Leonard Samuelson appeared to represent the petitioner. <br /> <br />Mann suggested that the eastern portion of the site should be seeded. <br /> <br />Replying to a question by Daniels, Mr~ Samuelson said that there will <br />be baffling to dampen sound and that the circulation system will have <br />charcoal filters to reduce odors. <br /> <br />Parham asked about the question of land division. <br /> <br />The Building & Planning Coordinator replied that the parcel in ques- <br />tion is part of a larger parcel and that any recommendation for <br />approval should be conditioned on division of the parcels. He also <br />stated that there is a question of whether this land must be platted <br />or if it can be divided as a minor subdivision. <br /> <br />planninq Commission Recommendation (January 15. 1974): <br />Motion by Mann, seconded by Harty to recommend approval of the land- <br />scape and plot plan with the stipulations that (1) the area marked as <br />a private road easement be treated, at least to the ppint of seedingj <br />(2) that the tree directly in front of the building be moved <br />approximately 15' - 20' to the westj (3) that the recommended approval <br />is not contingent on platting of the property, but only upon division <br />as a minor subdivision, and (4) that the owner provide a utility <br />easement over the most easterly part of the parcel. <br />