LP-018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ Wyman Nelson Enterprises -2- March 25, 1975 Planninq Commission Consideration (3-18-75): The Chairman read the background discussion. Mr. David Kasell was present to represent the applicant. The Chairman asked if the Engineer had looked at the drainage off the north part of the property and if it was his opinion that the drainage from that area would not cause any problems. The Building and Planning Coordinator stated that the Engineer had not looked at this and that the opinion stated in the write up was his own. Daniels asked for clarification of what the front yard, what the side yards and what the rear yards were of the proposed development and questioned whether the parking setback from New IIighway 8 was adequate. Thz Building and Planning Coordinator explained that under the proposed definition it would seem that the structure is oriented towards County Road D and that would be the front yard side of the building. Under the present Zoning Code, that is the short street side of the lot and would also be considered the front. He further explained that under the definitions as written in the ordinance, the side yard is the part of the lot immediately adja- cent to the building and that in this particular case, the area north of the building is considered rear yard so that the parking does not violate the side yard setback requirements. pJanninq Commission R<?commendaticm (3-],8-75): Motion by Harty, seconded by Bohling, to recommend approval of the landscape and plot plan contingent on approval of the subdivision of the property. Motion carried, 4-1 (Daniels) D~niels stated h~ voted no for consistency with his previous vote.