Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />LP-30 <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />We would suggest that the following also be considered <br />in the review of this matter: <br /> <br />1. That the south driveway entrance be reduced unless there <br />is a definite neeo for the added width. Our concern <br />is that the shape of this driveway may lend itself to <br />be used for parking. It would appear that the curb <br />radii could be increased if vehicles need the added <br />turning distance; <br /> <br />2. That the above missing information be supplied prior to <br />Planning Commission action~ <br /> <br />3. That more specific details be supplied in relation to the <br />decorative block eyto~iur treatment. <br />