LP-106 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION NO NEW BRIGHTON PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF REVIEW RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PUD-2 WHEREAS, An application for a Planned Unit Development, PUD-2 has been made by Tom Willmus to develop property generall south of County Road E and west of Old Highway #8; and WHEREAS, The procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a Planned Unit Development was filed with the City on August 14,1980."," 2. That the Board of Review heard and reviewed the ~ application at its regular meeting on August 19, 1980. 3. The written comments and analysis of the City Planner and all person's statements made at the Board of Review meeting were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Review that the following Findings of Fact are made in respect to Planned Unit Development, PUD-2: 1. That the property is approximately 17 acres in size and is located generally south of County Road E, west of Old Highway #8 and north of the Soo Line Railway right-of-way. 2. That the site is presently vacant and is currently zoned I~2, Heavy Industrial. 3. That the property to the north and south is zoned I - 2, He a v y I n d u s tr 1 a 1 and z 0 n e d R ~ 1, Sin g 1 e Fa m il y Residential to the west. 4. That the proposed New Brighton Comprehensive Plan designates a proposed land use of restrictive industrial with development standards listed on page 8 Land Use items "a-g." (February 1, 1979). 5. That the City Council at its regular meeting on August 12, 1980 found the proposed office/warehouse distribution center consistent with the Comprehensive Plan on the basis that development applicant will be processed in accordance with Section 11-500 Planned Unit Development of the zoning code, and that the development proposal comply with the standards "a-g" outlined on page 8, Land Use of the Comprehensive Plan dated February 1, 1979. 6. That the site is being designed to adequately handle the storage and eventually dispension of storm water runoff. 7. That the proposed use will be compatible with the surrounding developed area and will be attractive in environmental and aesthetic design. 8. That the existing utilities and proposed private roads and utilities are adequate to service the development. 9. That the burden or impact created by the proposed development on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities is relatively low and in general should have no detrimental effect. 10. That the uses of the property as presented by the applicant are office use and li9ht warehousing use not to include outside storage, chemical storage nor heavy manufacturing. 9 .