LP-213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. .' ( Board of Review -2- March 18, 1975 Motion by Parham, seconded by Bohling to recommend approval of the minor subdivision without platting conditioned on the granting of an easement for sewer purposes over the east parcel. Daniels asked about the compatibility of the proposed use wi~h adjacent uses and questioned whether the Board of Review should not consider future use of the adjacent land before making its decision on the subdivision. He asked if there should tie"a. plan presented .for the entire parcel. Other members stated that the particular development of the eastern parcel was some~hing that could not be dealt with at the present time. Motion carried, 4-1 (Daniels) Daniels stated that he voted no because he feels the character of the area is not stable. LP~.18. Wyman Nelson Enterprises: Tb.e Chairman read the background discussion. !VIr 0 David Kasell was present to represent the applicant. The Chairman asked if the Engineer had looked at the drainage off the north part of the property and if it was his opinion that the drainage from that area would not cause any problems. 'I'he Building and Planning Coordinator stated that the Engineer had not looked at this and that the opinion stated in the write up was his own. Daniels asked for clarification of what the front yard, what the side yards and what the rear yards were of the proposed development and questioned whether the parking setback from New Iiighway 8 Y,'as adequate. The Building and Planning Coordinator explained that under the proposed definition it would seem that the structure is oriented towards County Road D and that would be the front yard side of the building. Under the present Zoning Code, that site is the short street side of the lot and would also be considered the front. He further explained that under the definitions as written in the