My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LP-239
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Site Plan File - Approved PLZ 01900
>
LP-201-299
>
LP-239
>
LP-239
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2007 3:08:18 AM
Creation date
12/21/2006 3:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
House File
Address
301 CO RD E2 W
House Number
301
Street
E2
Street Type
CO RD
Direction
W
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ .t . <br /> <br />Febr'uary 1/ 1989 <br />Mr. Erny Mattila <br />Donatelle prperties, Inc. Building Two <br /> <br />The 73 foot right of way for County Road E-2 is wider than normal by 13 <br />feet and therefore 'provides the equivalent of a 53 foot setback. In <br />addition, the'placement,of the road surface completely on the South <br />portion of the right-of-way provides extra space for screening on the <br />residential properties if they so desire. <br /> <br />It also appears that a rear yard setback variance of two feet will be <br />necessary. This occu~s as a newly enacted parking ordinance requires a 5 <br />foot setback from the rear property line and the parking area. The <br />ordinance existing at the time of approval of the first building did not <br />require a setback and the site Planning was accomplished i~ this manner. <br />Weare able to reduce parking stalls from 20 feet in length to 18 feet <br />and reduce the driveway width from 25 feet to 24 feet, which are allowed <br />Under the new ordinance. This places the parking area 3 feet from the <br />property rine rather than 5 feet which means a' setback variance of 2 feet <br />is" necessary. This setb~ck is the result of 'an existing condition and a <br />new ordinance cQUpleq with the unique circumstances pertaining to this <br />site. We feel'that the impact of a 2 foot variance' in this area is minor <br />in nature and will not be detrimental to the adjacent property ot to the <br />pUblic as ,~~ whole. <br /> <br />The,development of this' Site has been a challenging task because of size <br />and configuration, setback' requirements, soil conditions and ponding , <br />requirements. ~he first building has been in place now since March, 1985 <br />and we feel that the );milding and landscaping' have .been an a"ttract:i,.ve <br />addi tion "to. ,this anoia of New Brighton, and the City in general.' The <br />functions contained within the s~ructuie have caused no noise, dust or <br />other undesirable effects for the neighbors or to the publi<;:: as a i"hole. <br />We feel that the development "to date has been everything stated it would <br />be during the initial planning sta"ge and we would like to complete 'the <br />site development to make the entire parcel an attractive addition to the <br />City. Your approval of the requested variances will allow us. to complete <br />the development. <br /> <br /> <br />submitted, <br /> <br />Mike. Donatel1e <br />Chuck Dqnatelle <br />DonatelleProperties <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.