My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-04-24
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1990
>
1990-04-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 6:41:17 AM
Creation date
8/10/2005 12:59:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />April 24, 1990 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Public Hearing - 7:37-9:55 p.m. <br /> <br />Benke explained that Council has adopted the issue of recycling and <br />solid waste as one of its major Future Focus priorities. <br /> <br />A work session was held in March with the Council, haulers, Ramsey <br />County staff, City staff, EQC members, and interested citizens. In <br />this work session the members accomplished the task of forming a <br />policy basis for the Council's solid waste policy framework. <br /> <br />It was noted that the City of Arden Hills received credit for the <br />volume of yard waste deposited by New Brighton and other communities <br />at the composting site in Arden Hills. This finding confirms that <br />Ramsey County has underestimated New Bri ghton I s efforts in yard <br />waste composting. <br /> <br />Brandt Rebelein feels the policy statement1s mandatory goals need <br />to be rewri tten to emphasi ze envi ronmenta 1 concerns of reduci ng <br />overa 11 waste and that portion of waste goi ng to 1 andfi 11 s. The <br />goals and objectives should be re-evaluated and plastic recycling <br />needs to be of major concern. The hauler's input is a valuable <br />resource and should be of major consideration. <br /> <br />Childs reviewed each mandatory and desirable goal of the pol icy <br />statement. <br /> <br />Williams noted that the large number of residents in attendance <br />illustrates the public interest in this important issue. <br /> <br />Larson found that in conversations with about 90 residents, not one <br />favored organized collection. All residents disliked the daily <br />appearance of trucks and garbage cans in their neighborhoods, and <br />encouraged recycling and neighborhood clean up programs. <br /> <br />Dave Fridgen, City Sanitarian, said the 1993 City goal is to reduce <br />waste by 35%. Ramsey County feels an organized system enables <br />cities to meet their goals. Fridgen noted that recycling tonnage <br />has increased monthly and the twice-monthly pick-up is successful. <br /> <br />Ramsey County places a tax" 1 evy of $21 per household to cover <br />recycling costs and the garbage burning facility. <br /> <br />Lanny Peissig, former EQC member and State of Minnesota employee, <br />is i nvo 1 ved in the permitti ng of 1 andfi 11 s. He noted that the <br />Pine Bend landfill, which receives a majority of Metro Area refuse, <br />is projected to be full by 1996. The issue is not whether a city <br />has an organized collection system, but where will the waste go <br />after Pine Bend is closed. Peissig feels it is important to <br />initiate a system which promotes a volume based fee for people who <br />recycle. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Solid Waste Plan <br />Report 90-94 <br />Resolution 90-30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.