Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />land locked, having no frontage on a public street, but served by a private access easement. <br /> <br />Second, the adjacent property in the abutting R-l district is a cemetery. Cemetery's are not permitted <br />uses in the R-l district but are a special use. The intent of the 50 foot district setback requirement is to <br />buffer permitted uses (single family homes) from larger structures such as apartment buildings.. In this <br />case the structure being built is a 10 foot high garage, and the land use being encroached on is a <br />cemetery. <br /> <br />Third, the proposed garage would be built into the side of a hill next to the cemetery. Since the garage <br />would only be 1 I) feet high, it would not be very visible from the R-l district. Also, there are two existing <br />garages similar to the proposed garage currently constructed five feet from the same cemetery and R-I <br />district line. . <br /> <br />In summary, due to these existing site cOI).ditions, not created by the applicant, the applicant is forced to <br />violate the district line setback requirement in order to provide some enclosed parking for his tenlffits. <br />The proposed garage would be setback from the R-l district line the same distance as the existing garage <br />buildings located to the north and south of the subject site. Also, the subject site.is located in the middle <br />of an existing apartment development which contains several buildings which' violate existing zoning <br />standards, Therefore, the garage setback should not be visibly out of character with the existing structure <br />on the subject site or with other structures in the immediately surrounding area, and should have a <br />minimal impact on the adjacent R-l district. <br /> <br />Strict enforcement of the district line setback standard would cause the applicant an undue hardship <br />because he would not be able to put his property to a reasonable use without a setback variance. Also, the <br />plight of the applicant is due to circumstances .~J?ique to the subject property not created by the applicant. <br /> <br />SITE PLAN REVIEW <br /> <br />The proposed improvements would bring the parking situation at the subject site into closer compliance <br />with the Parking Ordinance. The appearance of the site would also be improved with the addition of a <br />dumpster enclosure and foundation landscaping. <br /> <br />G:ICDI-96-CCRIERNYlNC-103,WPD <br />