Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Council Meetin Minutes <br />December 13, 1 88 <br /> <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />Council Busine s continued <br /> <br />The biggest pr blem the Army sees in the near future, is not a water <br />shortage, but n excess of treated water. <br /> <br />The Army feels the City's policies have been met with the <br />construction 0 the GAC system. <br /> <br />Connor quoted the City's production policies dated January 1985, <br />whi ch read, liT e Ci ty bel i eves the storage capacity plus the well <br />pumping capaci y with the largest pump out of operation, shall be <br />equal to the maximum daily domestic demand in 16 hours and a 10 hour <br />fire demand of 5,000 gallons per minute". <br /> <br />With Wells #8, 9, 10, 11, 12 at their capacity plus the projected <br />capacity for t e GAC System, the total capacity is 7,600 gpm. In <br />addition, the City has 2,600,000 gallons in storage capacity. <br />According to C nnor's calculations, the City would have an excess <br />of capacity. <br /> <br />Connor said "t e Army's final point is, as far as we know, the Mt. <br />Simon-Hinckley Aquifer is not contaminated, we are very concerned <br />that additi ona 1 dri 11 i ng and additi ona 1 pumpi ng of Mt. Simon- <br />Hinckley Wells may result in contamination of that aquifer. This <br />view of additi nal contamination is not only the Army's view but <br />also the USGS, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources". <br /> <br />Connor said wh n drilling through a contaminated area, there is a <br />possibility of contaminating the lower aquifer and also by pumping <br />the well it co ld draw the contamination into the lower aquifer. <br /> <br />Larson asked, "referri ng to the statement of cross contami nati on <br />going from M. Simon-Hinckley down. Our new wells, the <br />reconstruction of #8 and #9, and the addition of #10, #11, and #12; <br />would address his problem. So it appears that, we may have to put <br />on a GAC sys em to offset what we have done to remedy our <br />situation". <br /> <br />Connor replied "I hope not, we can't say that right now, we just <br />don't know. T e odds are that the more you pump those lower wells, <br />the greater t e possibility of eventually through a naturally <br />occurring frac ure or an artificially occurring fracture; you could <br />draw contamina ion from the Prairie Du Chien-Jordan Aquifer to the <br />Mt. Simon-Hinc ley Aquifer. That's one of the reasons why the Army <br />insisted in the settlement agreement that the City agreed they would <br />use 80% GAC tr ated water. We don't want to get to the situation <br />a year from no or five years from now or ten years from now; to <br />agree about what caused the contamination of the Mt. Simon-Hinckley, <br />that's in nobo y's interest". <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Presentation of EPA <br />Covering Replacement ot <br />We 11 #7 <br />Report 88-349 <br />