My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-12-13
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1988
>
1988-12-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 6:26:32 AM
Creation date
8/10/2005 1:41:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />December 13, 19 8 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Page 14 <br /> <br /> <br />Council Busines continued <br /> <br />Williams thanke Captain Connor for his presentation. <br /> <br />Ross asked "i the Army is concerned about contami nati ng the <br />Hinckley with t e new well, would it be your recommendation that we <br />discontinue our other Hinckley wells and the Army drill us new wells <br />in the Jordan". <br /> <br />Connor "sir, our recommendation is that you mlnlmlze the <br />use and there i nothing that suggests at this time that the use of <br />existing wells has caused the problem. If you look at the map of <br />Exhibit D, the proposed Well #13 is in a totally different area, <br />it's not locate anywhere near the existing wells. Nobody has a map <br />of what 1 ays u derground, its not beyond the possi bil ity in that <br />area you may bin the regi on of a natural occurri ng fracture. <br />Pumping in that region, may draw water down from the Jordan into the <br />Hinckley. We are certainly hoping that the City will minimize the <br />use of its exis ing wells, and again that this why the Army required <br />the City to us 80% GAC treated water. As part of the settlement <br />agreement, if the City finds at a later date that it needs <br />additional pro uction of water capacity, the Army will pay the <br />incremental co ts associated with this. There are some costs <br />associated with supply and production capacity which the City will <br />bear. If it is a cost, associated with contamination, the Army <br />would pay those costs". <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />A letter from M . Adamkus, Regional Administrator, EPA, stated that <br />$113,000 had b en obligated in the planning and designing of Well <br />#13. The City's costs were included in the settlement. Which <br />included costs of land, some preliminary engineering work. <br /> <br />John Drawz, Cit Attorney, said EPA made a request on September 30, <br />1988, for the i ty to pay $14,000. Si nda confi rmed the Ci ty had <br />sent the requested $14,000 to EPA two months ago. <br /> <br />Williams asked if pumping out the upper aquifer makes sense, would <br />it be a good id a to hook-up Well #7 to a carbon filtration system?" <br /> <br />Connor replied that this was considered, but Carbon filtration is <br />expensive. Un er the law, the water which could be produced from <br />Well #7 is dri kable. It wouldn't necessary make sense to use up <br />more capacity f r the carbon vessels with water that is at 1.9 ppb. <br />The Army feels he area that is most contaminated should be treated. <br />The Army chose ells #3, 4, 5, 6 because operationally it was easier <br />to group them, and these wells appear to be in the center of the <br />plume. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Presentation of EPA <br />Covering Replacement <br />of Well #7 <br />Report 88-349 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.