Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Council Meeti <br />November 22, <br /> <br />Council Busi n <br /> <br /> <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />continued <br /> <br />Gunderman feels some form of documentation should be included for <br />the annual in orne. <br /> <br />Williams sugg sts, the Citizen Study Committee should try to keep <br />the Council u dated on the progress of this study. <br /> <br />Schmitz asked, the Council IS preference on the timing of this study. <br />Benke suggest d a concept and study be forwarded to the Council, <br />sometime afte the January Citizen Study Committee. <br /> <br />Moti on by Ben e, seconded by Wi 11 i ams, TO REC<Mt1END THE CITIZEN <br />STUDY COMMI EE DO A FOLLOW-UP STUDY TO CONSIDER A POLICY <br />AUTHORIZING A ATER AND SEWER RATE REDUCTION PROGRAM FOR SENIOR AND <br />DISABLED CITI ENS. <br /> <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Na es, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Utility Payments for <br />Handicapped/Disabled <br />Residents <br />Report 88-338 <br /> <br />Schmitz menti ned, the Citizen Study Committee is still discussing Junk Mail - Citizen <br />the junk mail issue that was brought to their attention a few weeks Study Committee <br />ago. <br /> <br />Williams aske if there is a some kind of a program funded by the <br />State to assi t low income people with their heating bills. Sinda <br />commented, th t most of these programs are funded by community <br />action agenci s which provide funds to utility companies in <br />assisting low income individuals. <br /> <br />Item #6 (Requ st to Tab~e Consideration of Development Agreement <br />with Welsh Co panies) .from the Consent Agenda were presented for Development Agreement <br />discussion by Brandt. with Welsh Companies <br />Report 88-328 <br /> <br />Locke updated the Council on the continuing negotiations with Mr. <br />and Mrs. Yem a and the Liquid Scale Company. Staff has asked <br />Winfield Mitc ell to appraise the properties and has met with the <br />parties involv d. Jack Bagley, relocation consultant, has met with <br />the Yempas re arding their relocation benefits. <br /> <br />Locke explain d, the staff is in the process of evaluating the fair <br />market value 0 these properties and is requesting this development <br />agreement be ontinued until further investigation is completed. <br /> <br />Brandt asked Locke the rationale involved in delaying the <br />consideration of development agreement; Council cannot direct staff <br />to go ahead a d negotiate relocation benefits with these residents <br />without a neg tiated development agreement. <br />