My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SP-055
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Special Use Permit File PLZ 02100
>
SP 001-100
>
SP-055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2007 12:13:08 PM
Creation date
2/1/2007 3:28:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, , <br /> <br />c)uncil proceedin(:fs <br />city of Ne~ Brighton <br />~1a.y 14, 1974 <br /> <br />problem of park facilities in the area and the potential <br />connection of New Brighton land with that of the PRD open <br />space. <br />S ayes - Q nayes - carried <br />Motion by Fisher, seconded by Eagon.to request the Planning <br />Commission to review the tennis court facility as previously <br />proposed relative to the new PRD proposal investigating the <br />problem of public park acceSSi relationship of the tennis court <br />to the land use of the proposed PRD including the apartments <br />to the nortDi and,exploring the question of shared parking and <br />access for the public park from the tennis court facility. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />Motion by Eagon, seconded by Fisher to direct administration <br />to publish and mail notices to affected property owners of a <br />consideration by the Planning Commission of revised PRD #19 on <br />Tuesday, May 21, at 7:30 p.m. <br />S ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />I'~ntion by Fisher, seconded by Rebelein to continue hearing <br />to I"lay 28, 9: 12 <br />'- ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br /> <br />~ttorney stated hearing was properly called <br />1'-!r. Jarites Bullock, 221 Oakwood Drive, questioned the <br />width of the lots proposed and the kind of homes that would <br />be placed on those lots. The petitioner stated that <br />the lot width varied from 82-90 feet and that single <br />faDily homes would be constructed <br />Motion by Eagon, seconded by Anderso~ to close hearing <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />~otion by Rebelein, seconded by Eagon to approve preliminary <br />plat, PL-80 <br />~ ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br /> <br />Notion by Bromander, seconded by Eagon to waive council <br />rules of procedure and consider Item 7J. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />Hction by Eagon, seconded by Rebelein to approve final <br />plat, Vescio's Third Addition <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br /> <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called <br />Mr. A. Hammer was present to answer council questions <br />Motion by Fisher, seconded by Rebelein to close hearing <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />Motion by Fisher, seconded by Rebelein to approve SP-55 <br />on the following conditions~ <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />PRD #19 <br /> <br />Continue <br />Hearing <br />r1a y 28 <br />8:12 <br /> <br />PL-80 <br />Vescio <br /> <br />9:14 to <br />9:28 <br /> <br />J!'inal <br />Plat - <br />Vescio's <br /> <br />/~, <br />/ SP-5S; <br />"-- -- <br /> <br />9:30 to <br />9:45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.