Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'~(;,-~~:,,~::~'.....;_:. 'r; : l~' .. <br />~. ". '~. '. , '. .... <br />~ .~" , <br />'. <br />Gouncil Proceedings <br />City of New Brighton <br />11 <br />June 8, 1976 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />': =: -~ <br /> <br />:::: .....: T= r iL~ ~ .,.:.~ <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Robert Polzak, 1693 14th Avenue :NVJ, stated that the <br />legal question ra ised by Mr. 'Wozniak should be <br />answered. He further stated that the special use <br />permit Should be strictly construed by the council <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by Fi sher to continue <br />hearing to the first meeting in July <br />Motion was withdrawn <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Al Frepch, representing Cerny ,and Associates, architects <br />for the Seminary, stated he felt the master plan <br />presented met the requirement of special use permit. <br />He state(j he, felt the plan was as precise as it could be <br />,.given th,e timetable for development. He added that <br />it would'.be undes irable for many reasons to place all <br />.. < educational activities ,under one. roof. <br /> <br /> <br />"Motion by Fisher,' seconded by Hardt to waive reading of <br />resolution and to adopt resolution entitled RESOLUTION <br />. .A FI~PINGOFFACTTHAT A CAREER DEVELOPMENT <br />CENTER:,I$' )\N . EDUCATIONAL BUILDING and tha t such <br />resolution include the finding.that in accordance <br />with ,special use permitSP-58 , "Resolution 1466 ,2C2, i <br />a . career ,dev,elopment. center is an' educational building <br />.andnoting .the intent of the Council that the definition. <br />educational building in SP-68 was to have, 1I0.rll <br />inserted,between the uses specified. <br />3ayes~.0 nayes- carried <br /> <br />RESOLUTION <br />NO~1720 <br /> <br />',,!;, <br /> <br />~b~~~' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />by Hardt, seconded by Fisher to call special <br />meeting for 7 p.m~, .June 17 and to continue hearing on <br />master plan and building permit (LP-3l) united <br />Theological'Seminary to that date.and time <br />3 ayes,~, 0 nayes~;carried <br /> <br /> <br />Special <br />Meeting. <br />June 17"- <br />7 p.rn <br /> <br /> <br />. . ., . <br />, . Attorney stated hearing was properly called . <br />The city Planner reviewed the planning report <br />the Planning Commission recommendations <br />Diana Eagon, attorneyrepresentingRogerWilson~ <br />was present. She 'statedtha t the architecture of the <br />building\\ouldnpt'bedisturbed with the granting <br />of tilis ,variance <br />. Motion by Hardt,. seconded by Fisher to continue <br />hearing .to June 22 at 8:04, and to direct <br />administration to ~ontact the owner of the property <br />to notify him of the. continued he~ring andto <br />notify him of the Council's desire to have a sign <br />plan consistentV/iththe oruinance presented by him at <br />the continued hearing . <br />3 ayes - Onayes~' rried <br /> <br />continue to <br />June 22 <br />8:04 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />