SP-064 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

in yards abutting streets (Section 10-120 (CI) ). The industrial districts is ?O is 1 foot or less. side yard setback (SectionlO-l20 (b) ). :RRq;uirec'lsicle yare1 setback is 15 feAt-= Existing side yarcl setbackalong ~.'7estern property line is from 7 - I? feet. Inadequate y,]all treatment on street sire of structure (Section 10-130 (1) ). " there maybe a question r~garding the front yard the property. If the front yard is f1efineo as being north of the fr'ont building line of the rendering plant buildir.g then there would be the adc'led non-conformity of front yard parking in an inc'lustrial district. There ~s a watchman's house located near l~th St. NE. which if used to n.efinethe front yard woule place allof the renc1pring plant parking in the rear yard. Gpnerally, accor(jing to Section 2-7?O, Yard, Front> the front yarr'l is described as being that area lying in front of" thA1A]alls of the principal structure facing the front lot line. ,Ho~,'7ever, Section~-710, ~, indicates that where due to the unusual configuration of a principal structure or of a lot, the definition of any yard appears inapplicable, the yards shall be determined at the time the building permit is issued. We would thus suggest that the Planning Commission comments as to how the front yarcl shouln be defined. In relation to the non-conformities, the applicant has proposed to meet the ordinance requirements by purchasing a small strip of lann from the Gordon Rendering Co., along their \olestern propf-'rty line, this woule'! eliminate the non-confomrity of inadequate side yard setback. No other improvements are indicated on plans submittea by the applicant. The applicant has indicatdd in a letter that they have not curbed their entry way because it woulc'l cause problems in their snow removal. ' The applicant has further indicatec'l that they cannot purchase property to south and as such the rear yard non- conformity must remain.