SP-064 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

___,,~____,:'-",_",C"_ '. Board of Revie"l -4- It was further noted that the present plan is an improvement over last years plan in that concrete curbing is shown to replace the bituminous curbing. 4 ayes, 0 nayes - carriec. SP-72, NC-ll LP-l~ -- The Menqelkoch Company .. The City Planner revieweA his comments. Muriel Bochnak, representing the Mengelkoch Company,w~s present. Ms. Bochmak noted that the Mengelkoch Company has complieo with all pollution control regulationso Partyka provider some history noting that it was felt in 196: that rendering plants shou10 not be a permitted use in the cistrict but shouln require a special use permit. ,j- l>nderson stated that the 2cquiring of the small parcel from _)Gordon Rendering does not appear to De meeting the intent of the ordinance in reoucing non-conformities. Anderson inoicatec that landscaping and screening may be more appropriate to lessen the impact of the non-conformities. Fredrickson asked the applicant what she considered to be the front yard of the property. Ms. Bochnak stated that she felt the area in front of the watchmans house adjacent to }'i,th ~.'t. was the front yar(L Councilman Hardt asked the applicant what the exterior treat- ment would be for the addition. Ms. Bochnak replied that the exterior treatment is shown to be painted concrete block to match the existing building. ~he further indicated that the plans are to paint the entire building once the addition has been completed., ).\'ls. Bochnak statef! that it woulC! be impractical to provide a fancier block treatment on the 14th St. side of the addition because it would differ from the existing building and because much of the addition will be window area~ Anderson stated that he felt there were some unique circumstances regarding this property, such as; the topography with the high