Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8. The city Council did on Dece~bcr 9. 1975" hold a <br />pu~lic hcnring purcuant to propar and timoly <br />publishod ~na ~ailed notico. <br /> <br />9. Tnnt ~t Enid public hearing ull pcr~onn viching to <br />be hoard 'Nero given an opportunity to c,;praoEl <br />their pOElition and reasonn for tilat position. <br /> <br />10. Tho City council has considered nll stnt.emcnte mado <br />in favor of End opposod to the request, tho '~ritten <br />report of tho nuilding nnd Pl~nnin9 coordinator, <br />thcroiilutcs nndrecomrnonc1ntion of the Plnnning <br />Commission and the chnractcr of the ~re~ in which <br />tho proposed business \,'oulc:l be operated. <br /> <br />DE IT FL~THER RBSOLVED, That tho applicntion for SP-65 <br />be donied for the foll~;in9 reasons: <br /> <br />1. This typo of buoincsf; operation ""Quid n~t be <br />tlppropriato nt the propooed location hecauso it. 10. <br />in a cmall local commorcial orca not well oeparntod <br />from residential development. <br /> <br />2. The proposed operation could croate serious police <br />problemEi. - <br /> <br />3. Tho potential dioruption to the nearby residential <br />aroa from noiso, increased traffic, litter end <br />ponsiblc (Jisturbancea \\lould be detrimental to <br />rcsidcnto of tho nron. <br /> <br />4. The proposed businoss at this location is not <br />essential or desirable to pUblic convonienco, safoty <br />welfare. <br /> <br />5. The proposod business io not in hormony with the overal <br />objectivo of thc;zoning code. <br /> <br />Adopted this 23rd doy of December 1915 <br /> <br />ATTESTs <br /> <br /> <br />./" <br /> <br />_ . 'x::Un~ &)J-<~ <br /> <br />II Vernon C. Pederson. Clerk-='rrennuror <br /> <br /> <br />-I (SEAL) <br />