Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tI#,';" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />~~- <br /> <br />. <br />J <br /> <br />:"". <br />" <br /> <br />,._' '_H <br />C," "",~'''~'''~II.f'' ~ '.".~...,; <br /> <br />.........-.....'--_... <br /> <br /> <br />Council Proc2edjngs <br />city of New Brighton <br />~April 13, 1976 <br /> <br />J, <br /> <br />Doug Peterson, 553 9th street Nt'), owner of the <br />building stated that the building area was <br />30 x 40 feet. He added that the amusement center <br />would be well managed. <br />Councilman Fisher questioned whether sufficient parking <br />was available for the proposed use. <br />Motion by Werdouschegg, seconded by Hardt to close <br />heaxing <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />Hotion by Hardt, seconded by V'erdouschegg to <br />direct administration to prepare a resolution <br />denying SP~70 including the following findings: <br />1. Parking requirements are not met, <br />2. The center would be too closely located <br />to the liquor store, <br />3. There is potential for unsightly debris, <br />4. It may create a nuisance by way of noise, <br />5. It would be a place o[ potential mischief; <br />6. Arez< resid~nts had expressed opposition. <br />S ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br /> <br />Adm. to <br />Prepare <br />Resolution <br />SP-70 <br /> <br />Attorney stated hearing remained properly called <br />The City Planner reviewed his report and the <br />Planning Commission recommendations. <br />Mr. Charles Nolan, app1iccnt, was present to <br />respond to Council questions. <br />Councilman \.<'erdouschegg stuted that the two <br />portions of th2 contour map did not have grade lines <br />which met. <br /> <br /> <br />Close <br />Hearing <br />9:49 <br /> <br />E-Z Mini <br /> <br />9:50 <br />10:17 <br /> <br />Hro Nolan stated that the final contours are anticipated <br />to be busically the same as existing contours. It <br />was noted by the staff that surveys were taken at <br />different times but that the drainage indicated on <br />the contour map was essentially the same as <br />currently existse <br /> <br />Mrs. Bourquim. 506 2nd Avenue Nol!. stated no objections <br />to the proposal but stated concern that hauling of <br />materials could create a dust problem and that loads <br />should be watered down. <br />Mr. Nolan stated that there may be some problem with <br />incoming fill in this regard. <br /> <br />Mrs. Howard Thompson, 518 2nd Avenue Nv] 0' questioned what <br />'-"-route would be taken by hauling vehicles. <br />Ivlr. Nolan responded that they would come along the west <br />property line of the Shell,stqtion, onto County Road E2 <br />and then on to 35W. <br />