SP-068 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Review Mr. Nolan stated that construction was desired for the ifuture and that it may require future excavation to replace all of the un- suitable material. 'The Building and Planning Coorc3inator asked if condition #2 were a problem. Mr. Nolan stated that it could be because the rate of excavation was depenaent on the demand for topsoil and the weather conditions. Harty felt that condition #2 could be reworded so that any site excavation in one year also be filled during that year. Sohling stated that he was unsure of the need for condition #4 of having'all filled areas covered over weekends and holidays. Mr. Nolan stated that he would like to have a stockpile maintained on the property to insure the completion of the project. He also stated that he would be agreeable to finishing the operation on a contract basis and fill any excavated area at the end of each construction season. The Building and Planning Coordinator noted that condition #4 of having all filled areas covered over weekends and holidays, is a standard condition of all fill permits. The Planner noted that the City Engineer and Building Inspector arrived at a figure of $20,000 as being reasonable for a performance bond. Additionally, it was felt that a height limit, somewhere between 101 and 151. should be established for any stockpiles. Motion by Harty, seconded by Partyka, to recommend approval of SP-68 subject to: 1. The excavation and fill proceed generally according to the delineated stages on the plan; 2. That filling proceed as excavation proceeds and that each stage be returned to grade by the end of each working season; 3. That unsightliness be kept to a minimum and if ordered by the Building Inspector, non-earth materials covered as soon as possible{