Laserfiche WebLink
<br />;:''jt~T~~''~';t".~(~;ij~~ijth~;<~.!~.~~;;i~Y;~:I~';';~ . .11 <br /> <br />oI!d.l>.A>d.. -... <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />, ."..' <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />council Proceedings <br />city of New Brighton <br />May 11, "1976 <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote on motion <br />Hardt to grant license: <br />F~sher Naye <br />Hardt Naye <br />\7erdouschegg <br />Bromander <br />Hotion failed <br /> <br />by Senden, seconded by <br /> <br />Senden Aye <br /> <br />Naye <br />Naye <br /> <br />Motion by Bromander, seconded by Fisher to waive <br />rules of order to consider Item 7M on the <br />agenda (Letter from city Attorney re: Long Lake <br />Park property acquisition) <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes- carried <br /> <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by S8nden to receive letter from <br />Donald L. Lais and Perry ~;L Copeland, Attorneys at Law, <br />regarding Miller Long Lake Park acquisition verdict. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes- carried <br />Motion by Senden, seconded by Fisher to authorize the <br />attorney to order a transcript of the trial and to file <br />notice of appeal <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes- carried <br /> <br />Letter <br />Ci ty Atty <br /> <br />Re:Long Lake <br />Park <br /> <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly continued <br />Hotion by Hardt, seconded by Sendon to receive letter <br />from Hark Clark <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes carried <br />The city planner presented the planning report <br />and Planning commission recommendation. <br />Councilman ~erdouschegg 0sked whether the proposed <br />plan was in conformance ';Ji th the sign ordinance. <br />The planner reviewed the general intent of the ordinance <br />and the particular provisions of areas of multiple <br />occupancy with individual and shared entrances. <br />Councilman Fisher asked how this ordinance provision had <br />been applied to other properties. <br />The Planner noted that it had been applied to two other <br />properites, 7-Eleven complex and the Brighton Village <br />Shopping Center. In those developments one ground <br />identification sign identifying the building and one sign for <br />each business had been allowed. <br />Councilman Fisher asked whether there \vere alternate <br />methods of signing the property which \'lould be commensurate <br />with the district design standards. The Planner stated <br />that that was possible. <br />Mayor Bromander asked whether one ground sign identifying <br />the building would be enough. <br /> <br />Clark <br />Pharmacy <br />Sp-69 <br /> <br />.....-..~ <br /> <br />9:40 to <br />10:25 <br />