Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,~"'~L"";,,,~,~,t.i,~";t-,t~}~i.~~""':""""""~' <br /> <br />--. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />council proceedings <br />city of New Brighton <br />}1(lY 11, 1976 <br /> <br />Motion by Hardt to approve the following sign plan: <br />1. Existing 8 x 8 foot plywood ground sign <br />2. Existing signs for Brighton Cleaners <br />3. Optical sign for Dr. Spencer <br />Motion failed for lack of a second <br /> <br />!-lotion by Werdouschegg, seconded by Bromander to approve <br />the existing signs as the sign plan for the property for <br />an 18 month period, conditioned on the developer <br />providing an acceptable sign plan for the property within <br />that time period and to grant special use permit <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />v:erdouschegg <br />Senden <br />Bromander <br />Hotion failed <br /> <br />Aye <br />Aye <br />Aye <br /> <br />Fisher <br />Hardt <br /> <br />Naye <br />Naye <br /> <br />Councilman Fisher stated for the record that he voted <br />against this motion because variance and special use <br />provisions do not allow for consideration of economic <br />hardship and require that variance be granted for <br />reasons of geometric hardship only. <br /> <br />Motion by Werdouschegg, seconded by Hardt to defer <br />action until June 22 council meeting and to ask <br />applicant to provide an alternate plan <br />4 ayes- 1 naye (Senden) - carried <br /> <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called <br />Mr. John Koontz, Town and Country Signs, stated that <br />the ordinance needed expert input. <br />The Building and planning Coordinator reviewed the <br />proposed ordinance <br /> <br />Mr. Harold Foley, Foley Finance, stated he had no <br />intention of taking his sign down for the next 20 years. <br />Koontz stated the amortization was unfair and took <br />less expensive signs away and allowed more expensive <br />cigns to remain. <br />Motion by ~erdouschegg, seconded by Hardt to c211 a <br />special meeting of the council for June 17 at 7:30 p.m. <br />in the council Chambers to consider the sign amortization <br />ordinance and to continue hearing of suggested ordinance <br />to that date and time <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />SP-69 <br /> <br />Defer to <br />June 22 <br /> <br />Sign <br />Amortization <br /> <br />10:26 to <br />10:46 <br /> <br />Special <br />Heeting <br />June 17-7:30 <br />