Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Proceedings <br />city of New. ighton <br />~J?ril 13, 1~6 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />the action before the Council began when the old <br />sign was removed and replaced with a new signa He <br />stated that an overall sign plan should be generateda <br />He further stated the sign was too large and <br />obstructed a window area of the building. <br />Councilman Senden asked what other sign changes <br />Mr. Clark contemplateda Mro Clark responded he had <br />nothing specific in mind <br />Mayor Bromander stated instead of looking at signs <br />one at a time on this property, there should perhaps <br />be an overall sign plan. <br />Mr. Clark stated this area is designated for renewal and <br />it seemed senseless to spend a great deal of money until <br />further decisions are made. Councilman Fisher pointed out <br />that no renewal areas had been designateda <br /> <br />SP-69 <br />Clark <br /> <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by Werdouschegg to continue <br />hearing to May 11 at 8:03 p.m. and to request that the <br />applicant prepare an overall sign plan for the property. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br /> <br />Continue to <br />May 11 - <br />8:03 <br /> <br />various Councilmembers noted that they would like to <br />see the following information at the continued hearing <br />on May 11: <br />I. A sign plan reducing the number and size of signsi <br />2. Information regarding the worth of existing signs; <br />3. Proof of hardship and uniqueness of design. <br /> <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called. <br />The City Planner reviewed his report and <br />Planning Commission recommendations. <br />councilman Werdouschegg stated that the question <br />of an amusement center was under consideration by <br />the council and any actions should be delayed until <br />a decision was made in that regard. He further <br />stated a full Planning Commission was not present at <br />the time the Planning Commission made a recommendation <br />on this application. <br /> <br />G~ <br />pruitt/ <br />Peterson <br />9:33 <br /> <br />Mrs. Gladys Walbon, 860 6th Avenue NVJ stated <br />opposition to the proposed amusement center because of <br />its proximity to the municipal liquor store and because <br />it would create a problem in the old area of town 0 <br /> <br />Mark Clark 858 5th Avenue, stated opposition to the <br />proposed special use permit. <br />